Erratum • The following article is Free article

ERRATUM: "AN X-RAYS SURVEY OF THE YOUNG STELLAR POPULATION OF THE LYNDS 1641 AND IOTA ORIONIS REGIONS" (2013, ApJ, 768, 99)

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , and

Published 2013 July 29 • © 2013. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation I. Pillitteri et al 2013 ApJ 773 80 DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/80

Download Article PDF

This is a correction for 2013 ApJ 768 99

Article metrics

601 Total downloads

Share this article

Author e-mails

ipillitteri@cfa.harvard.edu

Author affiliations

1 SAO–Harvard Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St, Cambridge MA 02138, USA; ipillitteri@cfa.harvard.edu

2 Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Toledo, OH, USA

3 National Optical Astronomy Observatory, USA

4 University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA

5 Department of Geology & Astronomy, West Chester University, West Chester, PA, USA

6 Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

7 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

8 INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Italy

9 School of Physical & Geographical Sciences, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK

10 CALTECH, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA

Dates

  1. Received 2013 June 27
  2. Published
Journal RSS
Create or edit your corridor alerts

What are corridors?opens in new tab

0004-637X/773/1/80

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Previous article in issue
Next article in issue

Due to an error at the publisher, the X-ray source identifiers in the published version of Table 4 are incorrect, which was brought to our attention by the HEASARC staff. We provide the revised table in electronic format with correct identifiers. The positional matches between the IR catalog and the X-ray catalog are corrected. The mistaken identifiers have no consequences for the published results. The same table in the online version is repeated twice. IOP Publishing sincerely regrets this error.

Table 4. List of X-Ray and IR Matches

SOXS ID R.A. Decl. J H K [3.6] [4.5] [5.8] [8.0] [24] 0/I/flat II III r
deg (J2000) deg (J2000) mag ''
1 83.4561 −6.3019 15.41 14.54 14.41 14.25 14.25 14.3 14.39 ... F F F 1.4
2 83.4596 −6.3586 11.75 11.03 10.86 10.75 10.74 10.65 10.62 ... F F T 1.3
3 83.4725 −6.2861 13.1 12.41 12.21 11.97 11.92 11.82 11.87 ... F F T 1.5
4 83.4939 −6.2542 11.67 11.31 11.26 11.32 11.28 11.24 11.25 ... F F T 1.4
5 83.5002 −6.5208 12.8 12.2 12.01 11.87 11.91 11.78 11.82 ... F F T 0.9
6 83.5087 −6.4517 ... ... ... 16.7 15.73 15.63 13.95 ... F F F 1.3
6 83.5084 −6.4528 ... ... ... 16.85 ... ... ... ... F F F 3.3
7 83.5159 −6.2679 12.04 11.36 11.18 10.98 10.92 10.86 10.84 ... F F T 1.4
8 83.5167 −6.2249 12.7 12.11 11.91 11.7 11.68 11.62 11.61 ... F F T 0.6
9 83.5259 −6.5125 11.59 10.84 10.59 10.42 10.39 10.34 10.3 5.68 F T T 2.1
10 83.5278 −6.4033 11.68 10.83 10.51 10.43 10.4 10.3 10.26 ... F F T 1.7

Notes. Columns are: SOXS source number, IR coordinates, 2MASS J, H, K magnitudes, IRAC [3.6], [4.5], [5.8], [8.0], MIPS [24] band magnitudes, a flag indicating Class 0/I/flat-spectrum object, Class II object, or Class III candidate status, and the match radius between X-ray and IR positions. X-ray sources with more than a potential IR counterpart have multiple entries.

Only a portion of this table is shown here to demonstrate its form and content. A machine-readable version of the full table is available.

Download table as:  DataTypeset image

In addition, the bottom left panel of Figure 3 has incorrect axis labels. We show here the panel plot with correct labels.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. IRAC [3.6] − [5.8] vs. [4.5] − [8.0]. See the caption of Figure 3 in the published version of the paper.

Download figure:

Standard image High-resolution image
10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/80