THE BINARY NATURE OF CH-LIKE STARS

, , , and

Published 2016 July 25 © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation J. Sperauskas et al 2016 ApJ 826 85 DOI 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/85

0004-637X/826/1/85

ABSTRACT

Yamashita has described a group of early carbon stars with enhanced lines of barium that resemble the CH stars but have low radial velocities. It is not clear whether they represent a class of stars separate from early R stars. Radial-velocity measurements and abundance analyses are applied in order to clarify the evolutionary status of CH-like stars. Radial-velocity monitoring was performed over a time interval of about 10 years. Abundance analysis was carried out using high-resolution spectra and the method of atmospheric models for three CH-like candidate stars. The radial-velocity monitoring confirmed regular variations for all of the classified CH-like stars, except for two, in support of their binary nature. The calculated orbital parameters are similar to those observed for barium stars in the disk of the Galaxy and their counterparts in the halo, that is, the CH stars. The relatively low luminosity of CH-like stars and the overabundance of s-process elements in the atmospheres are in agreement with a mass-transfer scenario from the secondary—an AGB star in the past. The kinematic data and metallicities support the idea that CH-like stars are thin/thick-disk population objects.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

Carbon stars are recognizable in the optical spectral region by the presence of absorption bands of carbon-bearing molecules (C2, CN, CH, C3, SiC, etc.) and are chemically characterized by having C/O > 1. The excess of carbon in such stars is the result of stellar nucleosynthesis in the star itself (intrinsic) or in a binary companion (extrinsic). The first classification system that subdivided the carbon stars by spectral characteristics was the R–N system established by Shane (1928). The R0–R3 stars showed relatively weak C2 and CN bands, while the R5–R8 stars showed strong bands with a continuum that extended at least down to 3900 Å. A revision of the Morgan–Keenan (MK) system of classification was performed by Keenan (1993), who divided carbon stars into a C–R sequence, a C–N sequence, and a C–H sequence with subclasses according to temperature criteria. The updated sequences are modeled on the old R, N system with a separate category for the CH stars. Thus, stars with enhanced carbon features come in many spectral types: N-type stars, R-type stars, barium and CH stars, R CrB stars, and dwarf carbon stars (Wallerstein & Knapp 1998).

Yamashita (1975) called attention to early carbon stars (the C0–C3 classifications of the MK system, the Harvard R0–R3 classifications) that exhibit the typical spectrum of a CH star but do not have the large space motions that are characteristic of the old population. The CH-like stars are classified in the revised MK system like any other CH-stars, and spectral peculiarities are indicated by abundance indices (Keenan 1993). The N-type carbon stars and late R-type stars are intrinsic AGB stars, while barium and CH-stars are the result of mass transfer in a wide binary system. The evolutionary status of early R carbon stars and, in particular, CH-like stars is still uncertain. According to Zamora et al. (2009), a large fraction of R stars are misclassified stars, some are binaries, and only a small fraction ("true R stars") are single carbon-rich stars.

It is possible that CH-like stars are analogs of barium stars in the old disk population (Začs et al. 2000, 2005). Recently, abundances have been calculated for three CH-like stars in the framework of a larger project devoted to the abundance analysis of R-type carbon stars (Zamora et al. 2009). On the other hand, Mennessier et al. (1997) found that barium stars are an inhomogeneous group of stars. Five distinct classes have been selected, i.e., some halo stars and four groups belonging to the disk population: roughly, supergiants, giants and subgiants, "clump" giants, and dwarfs. The relationship is unclear between halo barium stars and CH-stars, the CH-like stars classified by Yamashita (1975), and the subtypes of disk barium stars selected by Mennessier et al. (1997). A comprehensive analysis is needed to understand the evolutionary status of different subgroups/fractions.

Here, the results of radial-velocity monitoring are presented for most of the CH-like stars classified by Yamashita (1975). CH-like stars are analyzed relative to three comparison stars: a single moderately metal-poor G8 III giant HIP 80843 (Jorissen et al. 2005); a barium star found in the old open cluster, NGC 2420 (Smith & Suntzeff 1987); and the CH-star HIP 22403 classified by Yamashita (1975). In addition, metallicity and s-process abundances are calculated using high-resolution spectra for three CH-like candidate stars (HIP 105212, HIP 62831, and HIP 53522). All of the results of the abundance analyses published to date and the kinematic data are summarized and discussed.

2. OBSERVATIONS AND REDUCTION

Radial-velocity monitoring of CH-like stars began in 2003 using the CORAVEL spectrometer of Vilnius University installed on the 1.65 m telescope at the Moletai Observatory (Lithuania). All of the classified CH-like stars accessible with the CORAVEL spectrometer are included in the program of observation. The CORAVEL spectrometer (Upgren et al. 2002) is based on principles of the photoelectric radial-velocity scanner developed by Griffin (1967) and operates by scanning a spectrum of star across the mask and obtaining an on-line cross-correlation velocity. The standard deviation of a single observation for late-type stars brighter than about the 11th magnitude is usually better than 0.8 km s−1. The velocities have been standardized using observations of IAU radial-velocity standards (Udry et al. 1999) and are close to the system of velocities published by Nidever et al. (2002) and Marcy & Benitz (1989). The differences in zero-point were found to be 0.14 km s−1 for F-G-K-type stars and 0.4 km s−1 for M-type stars and exhibit rms scatters of 0.5 and 0.8 km s−1, respectively.

Two of the CH-like stars, HIP 43042 (Začs et al. 2005) and HIP 99725, have been monitored by Roger Griffin with the photoelectric radial-velocity spectrometer at the coudé focus of the Cambridge 36 inch reflector. Fifty-one radial-velocity measurements were made for HIP 99725 with a standard deviation of one measurement of 0.5 km s−1. To bring the zero-points of the Cambridge and Vilnius velocity systems into agreement, 0.8 km s−1 has been subtracted from the Cambridge measurements.

In total, 10 stars from the list of 16 CH-like stars published by Yamashita (1975, see their Table 2) have been monitored for radial velocities over a period of about 10 years in this paper. In the case of BD +08°2654 (HIP 62827, HIP 62830, and HIP 62831), three optically nearby stars (components A,B,C) located within 40 arcsec of each other have been included in the program of observations because of contradictory published basic data and the inability to identify with certainty a priori this CH-like star (see the discussion in Section 3). Table 1 gives the basic data for program stars and summarizes the abundances from the literature calculated to date. The standard notations are adopted everywhere.4 According to the collected data, HIP 58786 and HIP 62831 do not appear to be enriched in s-process elements. Thus, the status of HIP 58786 and HIP 62831 as CH-like stars is rejected. On the other hand, HIP 62830 seems to be a single F6 dwarf which, in projection on the sky, merely lies close to the CH-like candidate star HIP 62827 = BD +08°2654A.

Table 1.  The Basic Data and Abundance Indices for CH-like Candidate Stars and Comparison Stars

HIP Name Spectral Type1 V ${M}_{\mathrm{bol}}{}^{2}$ ${T}_{\mathrm{eff}}{}^{2}$ [M/H]a [C/M] [s/M]b [hs/ls]c References
2529 BD+29°95 R0; C3, 0 CH4 10.18 3.09 4200 ... ... ... ... ...
43042 BD+75°348 R0; C3, 0 Ba4 9.54 −0.97 4760 −0.5 0.5 1.6 0.4 4
53522 BD+16°2188 R0; C1, 1; C3, 1 CH4 10.11 −1.89 4955 −0.2 ... 1.0 0.6 present
53832 BD+41°2150 R0; C3, 1 CH3 Ba4 10.03 −0.63 4120 −0.77 0.46 1.26 0.72 6
58786 BD+71°600 R2; C2, 3 CH4 10.15 −0.98 4160 −0.29 0.53 −0.04 0.09 6
62827 BD+08°2654A R0; C2, 1 CH5 9.31 −0.48 4235 ... ... ... ... ...
62830 BD+08°2654C F6 V 10.7 ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
62831 BD+08°2654B K5 III 9.20 ... 4100 −0.6 ... −0.6 −0.6 present
80769 BD+19°3109 R2; C1, 1 CH4 10.29 −1.52 4600 ... ... ... ... ...
85750 BD+02°3336 R2, C3, 1 CH4 Ba4 9.39 −3.32 3740 −0.48 0.47 1.11 0.68 6
99725 BD+57°2161 R0, C4, 1 CH3 Ba4 9.68 −1.53 4555 −0.1 0.5 1.6 0.4 5
102292 HD 197604 R4; R2; C4, 2 CH8; C3, 2 CH5 9.28 −1.15 4165 −0.9 1.75 1.8 1.0 3
105212 HD 202851 R2; C3, 1 CH4 Ba3 9.67 −1.63 4780 −0.71 ... 1.5 0.2 present
    Comparison stars                
80843 HD 148897 G8 III CN-2 CH-1 Fe-1 5.25 −2.0 4350 −1.0 ... 0.0 −0.2 8
... NGC 2420 250 Ba II star 7 11.14 ... 4200 −0.6 0.8 1.2 0.2 7
22403 HD 30443 C4, 3 CH4: CN3: Ba4 8.82 −4.01 4115 ... ... ... ... ...

Notes. [M/H], [s/M], and [hs/ls] values are calculated using abundances published in the papers cited in the last column.

aM = $\langle $Ti, V, Cr, Fe, Ni$\rangle $. bs = $\langle $ls + hs$\rangle $. chs = $\langle $Ba, La, Ce, Nd, Sm$\rangle $, ls = $\langle $Sr, Y, Zr$\rangle $.

References. (1) Skiff (2009), (2) Bergeat et al. (2002), (3) Kipper et al. (1996), (4) Začs et al. (2000), (5) Začs et al. (2005), (6) Zamora et al. (2009), (7) Smith & Suntzeff (1987), (8) Jorissen et al. (2005).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

High-resolution spectra for HIP 105212 and comparison stars (HIP 80843, NGC 2420 250, and HIP 22403) were observed with the coudé échelle spectrometer MAESTRO fed by the 2 m telescope at the observatory on the Terskol Peak in Northern Caucasus (altitude of 3100 m) equipped with a Wright Instruments CCD detector with a resolving power of ∼45,000. For HIP 105212, a total exposure of 6000 s was obtained on 2006 November 25. The spectrum covered a spectral region from about 3600 to 10,200 Å in 85 wavelength bands overlapping shortward of Hα with a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) ∼ 100 in the red wavelength region. The spectra for two other CH-like stars, BD +8°2654 and HIP 53522, were extracted from the archive of observations achieved using the échelle spectrometer LYNX on the 6 m optical telescope of the Special Astrophysical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The reddest star (component B) from the three close components was accepted as the CH-like star during the observations of BD +08°2654. These spectra covered the spectral region from about 5000 to 7200 Å and have a resolving power of R ∼ 30,000. The spectra were bias subtracted, flat-field corrected, and converted to one-dimensional spectra using the standard DECH20T package. The wavelength calibration was made using Th–Ar spectra obtained for each night. In addition, a spectrum of a hot and rapidly rotating star was observed to identify the telluric absorption lines. The equivalent widths of the absorption lines were measured by Gaussian fitting to the observed profiles. Three representative spectral regions are shown for the CH-like star HIP 105212 along with those for the three comparison stars in Figures 13. Some absorption lines identified in the spectrum of HIP 105212 are marked.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Observed spectrum of the CH-like star HIP 105212 around the C2 (0, 0) Swan system band-head at 5165 Å along with those for the cool barium star NGC 2420 250, the CH star HIP 22403, and the single giant of similar temperature, HIP 80843. The increasing intensity of the band-head from the barium star towards the CH star is visible.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 2.

Figure 2. Same as Figure 1, but in a spectral region less blended by molecular features. Lines of neutron-capture elements are enhanced for all spectroscopic binaries in comparison with those for the single giant HIP 80843.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 3.

Figure 3. Same as Figure 1, but in the spectral region around the 12C 12C (1, 0) Swan system band-head at 4737 Å. Isotopic band-heads of 12C 13C (1, 0) at 4744 Å and 13C 13C (1, 0) at 4752 Å of increasing intensity are visible in the spectra of all spectroscopic binaries. A CH feature of similar intensity is visible in the spectra of the CH-like star HIP 105212 and the barium star NGC 2420 250.

Standard image High-resolution image

3. ANALYSIS AND RESULTS

3.1. Radial Velocities

The radial velocities along with the uncertainty of each observation, as a function of Julian Date for all program stars, are listed below (see Tables A1A10 in the Appendix). To assess binarity, we have computed the ratio E/I (where E refers to the standard deviation of the velocities and I to the weighted mean uncertainty of the measurements) following Jasniewicz & Mayor (1988). For stars with peak-to-peak velocity variations lower than about 2–3 km s−1, the detection of a binary motion is generally not statistically significant, since the corresponding E/I ratio is smaller than 2. The radial-velocity curves of the three stars (HIP 58786, HIP 62830, and HIP 102292) fulfilling this criterion are plotted in Figure 4, and the corresponding E/I ratios are given as labels in this figure. Among these, the first was shown in Section 2 (see Table 1) not be enriched with s-process elements and the second to be an F6V star. It is therefore not surprising that they do not show any binary signature, as it is very likely that they are not CH-like stars. HIP 102292 is thus the only CH-like star in our sample that does not show evidence of binarity based on its radial-velocity data. Nevertheless, it might be a binary seen nearly face-on. For the remaining stars of the sample, the accuracy of the observations and the length of the time monitoring are sufficient to search for orbital periods and calculate orbital parameters. Table 2 lists the orbital elements for those program stars for which orbits could be computed. The velocities, as a function of phase, resulting from these solutions are plotted in Figures 513, and the phases and residuals for the orbital curves are listed for the individual observations in the Appendix.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Heliocentric radial velocities plotted as a function of Julian date for three program stars: HIP 58786, HIP 62830, and HIP 102292. Weighted mean velocities, $\langle \mathrm{RV}\rangle $, their uncertainties, and the ratios E/I are calculated according to Jasniewicz & Mayor (1988).

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.

Figure 5. Observed heliocentric radial velocities of HIP 2529 plotted as a function of phase, with the velocity curve corresponding to the calculated preliminary orbital elements. Additional observations are needed to secure this orbital solution.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 6.

Figure 6. Same as Figure 5, but for HIP 53522.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 7.

Figure 7. Observed heliocentric radial velocities of HIP 53832 plotted as a function of phase, with the velocity curve corresponding to the calculated orbital elements.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 8.

Figure 8. Same as Figure 7, but for HIP 62827 = BD +08°2654A.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 9.

Figure 9. Same as Figure 7, but for HIP 62831 = BD +08°2654B.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 10.

Figure 10. Same as Figure 7, but for HIP 80769.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 11.

Figure 11. Same as Figure 7, but for HIP 85750.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 12.

Figure 12. Observed heliocentric radial velocities of HIP 99725 plotted as a function of phase, with the velocity curve corresponding to the calculated orbital elements. All of the measurements, except for eight (the open circles; Začs et al. 2005), were made by R. Griffin with the Cambridge CORAVEL.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 13.

Figure 13. Same as Figure 7, but for HIP 105212.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 2.  Orbital Elements with Standard Deviations for the Program Stars.

HIP P γ K e ω T a sin i f(m) ${\sigma }_{{\rm{O}}-{\rm{C}}}$
  (days) (km s−1) (km s−1)     (deg) (JDa) (Gm) (M) (km s−1)
2529 725 (20) 20.82 (0.2) 2.4 (0.1) 0 0 55457 24 (1.2) 0.00104 (0.00013) 0.42
43042 1042 (5) 51.66 (0.08) 7.29 (0.13) 0.347 (0.018) 233.7 (2.9) 52669 (7) 97.9 (2.0) 0.0346 (0.0021) 0.40
53522 360.8 (0.2) 33.06 (1) 13.58 (1.5) 0.358 (0.06) 81 (3) 56156 (8) 62.9 (7.0) 0.0761 (0.030) 0.50
53832 321 (0.6) −2.81 (0.2) 11.8 (0.1) 0.114 (0.012) 321 (9) 54182 (7) 51.7 (0.5) 0.0536 (0.0019) 0.50
62827 570.1 (0.5) 34.5 (0.11) 8.6 (0.2) 0 0 54449 67.2 (1.1) 0.0376 (0.0026) 0.48
80769 2129 (13) −183.6 (0.1) 7.5 (0.2) 0.186 (0.016) 226 (56) 55711 (32) 217 (4.2) 0.0894 (0.0064) 0.47
85750 446.4 (0.6) −27.23 (0.05) 10.6 (0.1) 0 0 55497 65.1 (0.5) 0.0552 (0.0016) 0.30
99725 541.1 (0.7) −62.14 (0.05) 6.39 (0.07) 0.044 (0.011) 30 (17) 54311 (25) 47.5 (0.6) 0.0146 (0.0005) 0.30
105212 1295 (6) 20.53 (0.07) 8.5 (0.1) 0.055 (0.01) 327 (17) 56323 (67) 151 (1.6) 0.0829 (0.0026) 0.30
Non-CH-like system
62831 1963 (6) −2.61 (0.09) 4.6 (0.1) 0.257 (0.029) 45 (6) 54567 (29) 121 (3.8) 0.0177 (0.0019) 0.64

Note. The Data for HIP 43042 have been Adopted from Začs et al. (2005).

aJD = T + 2,400,000.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

In the case of BD +08°2654A (HIP 62827), an orbit has already been published by McClure & Woodsworth (1990). The orbit calculated from our measurements is in good agreement with theirs, except for a difference of about one order of magnitude in the projected semimajor axis which seems to be a misprint in their Table 4 (McClure & Woodsworth 1990). The orbital elements estimated recently for two stars in common (HIP 53522, HIP 53832) by Jorissen et al. (2016) agree well with our calculations.

In addition, the radial velocities were measured using a sample of weak and symmetrical atomic lines in the high-resolution spectra of three stars. The direct and mirror profiles of each line were correlated, and the corresponding radial velocity was calculated from the relative shift of the line center from its rest wavelength. These values (see, for instance, Figure 12; open circles) agree well with the CORAVEL measurements.

3.2. Space Velocities

Galactic space velocities (${U}_{{\rm{LSR}}},{V}_{{\rm{LSR}}},{W}_{{\rm{LSR}}}$) with respect to the Local Standard of Rest, as well as the standard deviations of these velocities, have been calculated using the mean (γ) radial velocities from Table 2, the proper-motion data (μα and μδ) from Hipparcos (van Leeuwen 2007), and the matrix equations of Johnson & Soderblom (1987). The corrections for the solar motion have been taken from Schönrich et al. (2010): (${U}_{\odot },{V}_{\odot },{W}_{\odot }$) = (+11.1, +12.24, +7.25) km s−1. The distances have been estimated using parallaxes (ϖ), when available, or the bolometric-magnitude (Mbol) distance moduli from Bergeat et al. (2002; see Column 7 of Table 3 for the "Method" to these distances). In the latter case, we have assumed errors for the distances of 20%. Unfortunately, the distances calculated using the bolometric magnitudes (apparent and absolute) from Table 2 of Bergeat et al. (2002) do not agree well with those from the parallaxes taken from van Leeuwen (2007). Except for HIP 2529, the distances from the distance moduli are greater than those from the parallaxes.

Table 3.  Space Velocities along with Standard Deviations for the Program Stars

HIP ULSR VLSR WLSR V(tot) Distance Method Population
  (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (pc)    
2529 1.24 (2.26) 19.13 (4.73) −14.80 (5.94) 24.22 (7.92) 331.1 (172.1) ϖ Thin Disk
53522 −30.95 (18.62) 31.50 (13.21) 38.89 (8.86) 58.85 (24.48) 1811.0 (362.2) Mbol Thin/Thick Disk
53832 0.55 (5.03) 2.61 (4.15) −0.70 (2.34) 2.76 (6.93) 310.6 (126.3) ϖ Thin Disk
58786 −14.26 (9.89) −30.26 (8.98) −6.35 (5.42) 34.05 (14.42) 1294.0 (258.8) Mbol Thin Disk
62827 −12.15 (16.53) 19.44 (9.51) 50.79 (6.15) 55.72 (20.03) 227.8 (125.6) ϖ Thin/Thick Disk
62831 −24.24 (18.21) 5.81 (4.04) 9.66 (2.57) 26.73 (18.83) 186.2 (96.8) ϖ Thin Disk
80769 −126.05 (10.33) −173.70 (22.85) −14.34 (21.08) 215.10 (32.76) 1637.0 (327.4) Mbol Halo
85750 4.46 (4.48) 6.63 (7.16) −52.86 (13.72) 53.46 (16.11) 1549.0 (309.8) Mbol Thin/Thick Disk
99725 −16.72 (6.99) −46.89 (0.83) −18.64 (4.15) 53.16 (8.17) 802.0 (160.4) Mbol Thin Disk
102292 13.68 (3.52) 27.76 (0.92) 0.33 (3.70) 30.95 (5.19) 942.0 (188.4) Mbol Thin Disk
105212 61.73 (31.81) −25.46 (40.72) −25.11 (17.19) 71.34 (54.46) 373.1 (298.0) ϖ Thin/Thick Disk

Note. The method of distance estimation and stellar-population assignment are indicated in columns 7 and 8, respectively.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

For the stellar-population assignment, we have used only the Toomre diagram (see Figure 7 of Schuster et al. 2012). The criterion V(tot) > 180 km s−1 for the halo has been used, where V(tot) is the quadratic combination of the three Galactic velocities (V(tot) = ${\rm{[}}{U}_{{\rm{LSR}}}^{2}+{V}_{{\rm{LSR}}}^{2}+{W}_{{\rm{LSR}}}^{2}{]}^{1/2}$). This provides good separation between the halo and thick-disk stars. The criterion for separating the thick disk and thin disk is not as easy to define; values of V(tot) between 60 and 85 km s−1 have been used for this purpose (see Figure 1 of Fuhrmann 2002). Finally, based on the paper of Venn et al. (2004), we have used the criteria of V(tot) > 180 km s−1 for the halo, 70 < V(tot) < 180 km s−1 for the thick disk, and V(tot) < 70 km s−1 for the thin disk. (See also Figure 1.3 in Nissen 2004). Taking these criteria into account, plus the V(tot)s and their errors from Table 3, we have assigned stellar population types to the 11 CH-like stars. For the larger errors of V(tot), a clean separation between the thin- and thick-disk possibilities cannot be made. Yet, in spite of the sometimes significant standard deviations for V(tot), the results indicate that all of the analyzed stars, except one, are most probably disk objects (Table 3).

3.3. High-resolution Spectroscopy

The spectra of early-type carbon stars are relatively free of strong molecular lines in comparison with N-type carbon stars; however, many weak transitions of CN and C2 are visible in the optical region of the spectrum and blend with the atomic lines. Inspection of a high-resolution spectrum shows that relative to the moderately metal-poor ([Fe] = −1.0) giant HIP 80843 (G8 III), the lines of the iron-peak elements are of similar strength (see Figures 2 and 3), while features due to C2, CN, and neutron-capture elements are enhanced. For example, the neodymium, praseodymium, and cerium lines in the spectra of the CH-like star HIP 105212, and related spectroscopic binaries, are much stronger compared with those for HIP 80843, indicating a significant overabundance of neutron-capture elements. Typical R0–R3 stars show weak molecular bands, and their atomic-line spectra are equivalent to G9–K2 normal giants; however, the s-process elements usually are not enhanced (Zamora et al. 2009). The most prominent molecular features for HIP 105212 in the observed region are the C2 Swan system bands (1, 0) at 4740 Å, (0, 0) at 5165 Å, and (0, 1) at 5635 Å. In addition, over the entire analyzed spectrum, bands of the CN red system are evident, significantly blending the atomic absorption lines. Thus, most of the atomic lines are blended with molecular lines. The final selection of clean atomic absorption lines for the abundance analysis was done using the synthesized atomic and molecular spectrum for a typical carbon star.

3.3.1. Atmospheric Parameters

Effective temperatures for most of the program stars are estimated by Bergeat et al. (2002) using the intrinsic spectral-energy distribution plus the atmospheric model technique (see Table 1). An excitation analysis of the Fe i lines for analyzed stars generally supports these values. The surface gravities ($\mathrm{log}g$) were determined from the Fe i/Fe ii ionization balance, and the microturbulent velocities by forcing the abundances of individual Fe i lines to be independent of the equivalent width. The final atmospheric parameters for the three program stars are displayed in Table 4.

Table 4.  Atmospheric Parameters for HIP 53522, HIP 62831, and HIP 105212

Star HD/BD Teff $\mathrm{log}g$ ξt [Fe/H]
    (K) (cgs) (km s−1) (dex)
HIP 53522 BD +16°2188 4550 2.5 2.0 −0.2
HIP 62831 BD +08°2654B 4100 1.3 3.0 −0.4
HIP 105212 HD 202851 4800 2.1 1.5 −0.7

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

3.3.2. The Abundances

The abundances for selected iron-group and neutron-capture elements were computed using equivalent widths for three program stars with the main goal of estimating the metallicity and confirming the enhancement of s-process elements. A detailed abundance analysis for selected stars will be presented in the next paper. The standard LTE line analysis program WIDTH6, written by R. L. Kurucz, was used, which employs an input model atmosphere to compute the strength of a given atomic line formed in such an atmosphere. The model atmospheres were taken from the grid of Kurucz (1993). Oscillator strengths for the lines have been taken from a variety of sources compiled by E. Luck. A majority of the values are from high-precision laboratory measurements. Spectral lines stronger than 300 mÅ were not used for abundance calculations. The resulting relative abundances normalized with the solar-system abundances of Grevesse et al. (2007) are listed in Table 5. We used mean abundances of iron-group elements to quantify the metallicity, [M/H] = 1/5 ([Ti/H] + [V/H] + [Cr/H] + [Fe/H] + [Ni/H]), the abundance of Y to quantify ls, and a combination of the remaining s-process elements to quantify hs, [hs] = 1/4 ([Ba/Fe] + [La/Fe] + [Ce/Fe] + [Nd/Fe]; see Tables 1 and 5). One wavelength region around important atomic lines was calculated using the spectral synthesis code STARSP (Tsymbal 1996) based on Kurucz's code SYNTHE to illustrate the abundance results (Figure 14). The systematic errors produced in abundances by uncertainties in Teff (±200 K), $\mathrm{log}g$ (±0.3 dex), and ξt (±0.5 km s−1) would lead to errors of less than 0.3 dex, that is, a little worse than those for barium stars.

Figure 14.

Figure 14. Observed (dots) and synthetic spectra of the CH-like star HIP 105212 and two comparison stars in the wavelengths region from 5319 to 5331 Å. Synthetic spectra are calculated using adopted atmospheric parameters and scaled solar abundances. In addition, synthetic spectra with enhanced abundances of neutron-capture elements, [s/Fe] = +1.5 dex for HIP 105212 and +1.0 dex for NGC 2420 250, on average, are presented for both long-period binaries.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 5.  Relative Abundances of the Iron-Group and n-capture Elements for Three Program Stars

Star [Ti/H] [V/H] [Cr/H] [Fe/H] [Ni/H] [Y/H] [Ba/H] [La/H] [Ce/H] [Nd/H]
HIP53522 −0.2 (12) −0.4 (5) −0.2 (5) −0.2 (29) −0.1 (6) +0.4 (3) +1.1 (1) +1.1 (1) ... +0.7 (2)
HIP62831 −0.7 (24) −0.6 (18) −0.4 (9) −0.4 (71) −0.8 (9) −0.7 (4) −1.8 (3) ... −1.2 (3) −0.9 (3)
HIP105212 −0.7 (10) −0.7 (4) −0.9 (3) −0.7 (29) −0.6 (3) +0.6 (4) +0.9 (3) +0.7 (2) +0.6 (2) +0.9 (7)

Note. The number of lines used in the analysis is also given.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Large enhancements of s-process elements in the atmosphere of HIP 105212 relative to solar values are found; [s/M] ≃ +1.5 dex, on average. HIP 53522 displays a lower overabundance of neutron-capture elements, [s/M] ≃ +1.0 dex, on average. The fit between the observed and synthesized spectra confirms a moderate iron deficiency along with the overabundance of neutron-capture elements (see Figure 14). This suggests that material rich in carbon and neutron-capture elements has been added to the envelope of both stars. The heavy s-process elements are relatively more enhanced than the light s-process peak elements in the atmospheres of HIP 105212 and HIP 53522. However, for the reddest (coolest) star of the optical triplet BD +08°2654 (component B, HIP 62831), which is a spectroscopic binary (see Figure 9), no overabundance of neutron-capture elements has been found. Presumably, the carbon star is component A (HIP 62827) which, incidentally, is also a spectroscopic binary according to radial-velocity monitoring (see Figure 8). A high-resolution spectrum is needed to confirm the enhancement of carbon and neutron-capture elements in the atmosphere of HIP 62827.

4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Radial-velocity monitoring has confirmed with certainty the status of long-period binaries for all of the classified CH-like stars except two. The scatter of the radial velocity for the remaining two stars (HIP 102292 and HIP 58786) is approximately 3–4σ of the measurements, but regular variations have not been noted to date. However, the enhancement of s-process elements was not confirmed for HIP 58786 by Zamora et al. (2009). Thus, the status of CH-like star was rejected, and this star could be a single star. For HIP 102292, the orbital period could be very large or the orbit may be almost pole-on, and thus the amplitude of the velocity variations is quite low. Orbital periods calculated for the other nine program stars range from 321 to 2129 days. The eccentricities and mass functions are low on average, which lends support to the supposition that mass transfer might have taken place in the past and that the unseen companion is a low-mass star. The orbital eccentricities of the barium and CH-stars are, on average, lower than those estimated in a sample of normal G-K giants because of mass transfer in binary systems by different evolutionary channels as modeled by Han et al. (1995). Recently, more channels were introduced to explain some specific systems with a short period, large eccentricity, and a circumbinary disk (Abate et al. 2013; Dermine et al. 2013). However, we have not detected such systems in the sample of CH-like stars. Among the CH-like stars, none are found at short periods and large eccentricities on the $(e,\mathrm{log}P)$ diagram (see Figure 15). It is worth noting that neither pre-mass-transfer systems nor post-mass-transfer systems populate the avoidance zone in the bottom right corner of the (e–log P) plane (Mathieu 1994). The two exceptions, with P ∼ 3000–4000 days and 0.00 < e < 0.05, are due to the low accuracies of the eccentricities; high accuracies are difficult to obtain for such long-period systems, as discussed by Jorissen et al. (2016).

Figure 15.

Figure 15. The (e, log P) diagram for barium stars from A. Jorissen (2015, private communication, open circles), CH and CH-like stars from Jorissen et al. (2016, filled circles), CEMP stars from Hansen et al. (2015, open triangles), and CH-like stars from this work (filled triangles).

Standard image High-resolution image

The metallicities of CH-like stars are in the range from −0.2 to −0.9 dex (see Table 1): a typical value for the thin/thick-disk stellar population of the Galaxy. The abundances of neutron-capture elements are enhanced, [s/M] = +1.0 to +1.8 dex, in support of nucleosynthesis during double-shell burning. However, the luminosities of CH-like primary stars are too low to be on the asymptotic giant branch, in support of a mass transfer scenario from an AGB companion in the past. The [hs/ls] ratio in the atmospheres of the analyzed stars is clearly higher than that found for typical barium stars (Busso et al. 1999). The classical halo binaries, the CH-stars, are high-velocity objects with large [hs/ls] ratios, [hs/ls] ≃ +1.0 (see Figure 5 of Začs et al. 1998), because at their lower metallicities the heavy s-process elements have higher abundances than the light ones. In spite of a large spread of the [hs/ls] ratio, [hs/ls] ≃ 0.0 for most of the studied barium stars (see Figure 8 of Busso et al. 1999); however, all of the analyzed CH-like stars (except HIP 105212) display [hs/ls] ≥ 0.4.

Another difference is the high carbon abundance. Classical barium stars usually do not display in their spectra significant features of carbon-bearing molecules; as a rule, C/O < 0.6 (see, for example, Barbuy et al. 1992). However, no significant difference was found between spectra of the typical CH-like star HIP 105212 and the barium star in the old cluster NGC 2420; both display moderately strong C2 and CH bands (see Figures 1 and 3). Unfortunately, spectroscopic estimations of oxygen abundances for carbon stars using high-resolution spectra in the optical region are problematic, and the calculated C/O ratios are uncertain. Spectra in the infrared region are needed. Zamora et al. (2009) were not able to calculate the oxygen abundances for three observed CH-like stars. Začs et al. (2005) employed one weak oxygen line and calculated a C/O ratio for the CH-like star HIP 99725: C/O = 2.24. Dominy (1984) calculated oxygen abundances using infrared spectra for a sample of 11 early-type R stars and found C/O ratios from 0.9 to 3.3. Isotopic 13C lines are enhanced in the spectrum of the CH-like star HIP 105212 (see Figure 3), similar to that observed for a number of barium stars (Barbuy et al. 1992). For two of the analyzed CH-like stars, HIP 53832 and HIP 85750, the 12C/13C ratio was found to range from 22 to 24 (Zamora et al. 2009). On the contrary, HIP 58786, for which the status of CH-like star was rejected, displays 12C/13C = 70. True early R stars have 12C/13C < 10.

For the program stars, the separation between halo and thin/thick-disk stellar populations has been performed. In spite of several stars with significant standard deviations, the results indicate that all of the analyzed stars, except one, are most likely disk objects, thin or thick. We conclude that some CH-like stars are apparently analogs of the classical CH and barium stars in the old disk population; a few of the stars are standard barium and CH-stars. HIP 80769 and HIP 2529 could be a standard CH-star and a barium star, respectively, according to their radial and space velocities. However, abundance analysis is needed to confirm s-process overabundances. The comparison star NGC 2420 250, classified as a barium star, instead seems to be a CH-like star, bearing in mind the abundances and the old disk population membership. For the remaining stars, more accurate space velocities, distances, and detailed abundances are needed to secure their subtypes. Thus, the evolutionary status of one fraction of early-type carbon stars, the so-called CH-like stars, is clarified. As a consequence, the number of confirmed true (single) R-type carbon stars is low in the Galaxy, which is in agreement with conclusion reached by Zamora et al. (2009).

We thank Roger Griffin for radial-velocity monitoring and calculation of the orbital elements for HIP 99725. We acknowledge support from the Research Council of the Lithuania under grant No. MIP-85/2012, from the Latvian Council of Science under grant No. 09.6190, and from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México by way of project IN103014 of the PAPIIT/DGAPA. This research has made use of the Simbad database operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. We greatly thank the referee for his constructive and valuable discussions and comments which have improved this paper.

APPENDIX: RADIAL-VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS

Table A1.  Radial-velocity Observations along with Standard Errors for HIP 58786, HIP 62830, and HIP 102292

JHD Velocity (σ) JHD Velocity (σ)
(2,440,000+) (km s−1) (2,440,000+) (km s−1)
HIP 58786   HIP 102292  
52349.498 −21.4 (0.3) 53617.396 15.5 (0.4)
52368.402 −21.8 (0.3) 53619.426 15.8 (0.4)
52386.302 −21.6 (0.3) 53639.365 16.5 (0.4)
52793.395 −22.0 (0.5) 53649.369 16.2 (0.4)
53573.404 −22.1 (0.5) 53650.344 17.3 (0.4)
53864.415 −23.6 (0.6) 53675.270 17.6 (0.4)
    53708.225 14.7 (0.4)
HIP 62830   53866.534 16.6 (0.4)
47568.355 34.8 (1.2) 53867.532 16.8 (0.5)
47572.407 32.4 (1.4) 53980.428 17.0 (0.4)
47942.409 35.6 (1.7) 53992.332 16.6 (0.4)
47951.475 32.8 (1.4) 54037.674 15.5 (0.4)
48297.507 32.5 (1.1) 54045.559 15.6 (0.3)
52768.403 35.2 (0.8) 54058.600 15.9 (0.4)
53850.456 35.9 (0.8) 54059.640 16.5 (0.4)
53859.429 35.1 (1.0) 54066.589 16.5 (0.4)
54084.060 33.9 (0.6) 54246.502 15.9 (0.4)
    54357.389 16.3 (0.4)
HIP 102292   54383.396 16.9 (0.4)
53569.475 17.1 (0.5) 54470.196 15.9 (0.4)
53573.464 16.7 (0.4) 54471.170 16.7 (0.4)
53602.525 15.3 (0.4) 54602.530 16.5 (0.4)
53614.396 15.8 (0.4) 54748.226 16.4 (0.4)
53615.358 15.6 (0.4)    

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table A2.  Radial-velocity Measurements for HIP 53522 along with the Uncertainties, Phases, and Residuals for the Orbital Curve

JHD Velocity σ (O–C) Phase
(2,440,000+) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1)  
52327.935 28.1 0.4 1.0 0.389
52369.332 31.4 0.4 −0.5 0.504
52375.325 33.3 0.3 0.7 0.521
52382.335 34.5 0.3 1.0 0.540
52386.337 34.2 0.4 0.3 0.551
52399.378 36.3 0.3 0.8 0.587
52403.323 37.5 0.4 1.5 0.598
52419.256 37.8 0.3 −0.1 0.642
52423.257 38.5 0.4 −0.0 0.654
52749.432 33.3 0.5 −0.9 0.558
52768.340 36.2 0.4 −0.3 0.610
52785.348 37.2 0.5 −1.5 0.657
52786.351 38.7 0.5 −0.1 0.660
52953.039 20.7 0.5 −0.1 0.122
52954.036 20.5 0.5 −0.3 0.125
52961.034 20.9 0.5 0.5 0.144
52983.044 20.7 0.4 −0.1 0.205
52987.024 20.0 0.4 −1.0 0.216
53002.015 23.2 0.4 1.0 0.258
53706.673 20.3 0.5 −0.6 0.211
53791.444 28.8 0.5 −0.6 0.446
53816.418 31.6 0.5 −0.7 0.515
53850.339 35.7 0.5 −0.8 0.609
53859.320 36.2 0.5 −1.4 0.634
54062.010 21.5 0.4 0.9 0.195
54469.649 24.4 0.5 −0.2 0.325
54470.631 23.5 0.5 −1.2 0.328
54581.324 38.0 0.4 0.3 0.635
54582.329 38.0 0.4 0.2 0.638
54814.655 23.4 0.4 0.4 0.281
54916.443 34.6 0.4 0.2 0.564
54929.309 35.6 0.4 −0.4 0.599
54941.312 38.0 0.4 0.5 0.633
55266.433 33.3 0.4 0.2 0.534
55278.448 34.7 0.4 0.1 0.567
55301.329 37.6 0.4 0.2 0.630
56023.361 37.6 0.4 0.1 0.632
56035.303 39.1 0.4 0.1 0.665
56072.343 44.0 0.6 0.1 0.767
56399.304 39.6 0.4 0.1 0.673
56404.368 40.8 0.4 0.7 0.687

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Table A3.  Radial-velocity Measurements for HIP 2529 along with the Uncertainties, Phases, and Residuals for the Orbital Curve

JHD Velocity σ (O–C) Phase
(2,440,000+) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1)  
53615.515 18.6 0.5 0.1 0.460
53617.509 18.2 0.4 −0.3 0.463
53639.568 19.3 0.5 0.9 0.493
53649.503 19.3 0.5 0.9 0.507
53672.444 19.0 0.5 0.5 0.539
53706.359 19.1 0.5 0.3 0.585
53992.482 23.7 0.5 0.5 0.980
53993.477 23.8 0.4 0.6 0.981
54056.718 22.4 0.5 −0.6 0.069
54061.672 22.1 0.5 −0.9 0.075
54073.787 22.3 0.4 −0.5 0.092
54093.634 23.9 0.5 1.3 0.120
54357.520 19.3 0.5 0.9 0.484
54363.481 18.8 0.5 0.4 0.492
54383.459 18.8 0.5 0.4 0.519
54469.299 19.2 0.5 −0.1 0.638
54470.258 18.4 0.5 −0.9 0.639
54513.230 20.1 0.5 0.0 0.698
54747.410 23.8 0.4 0.6 0.021
54764.460 23.1 0.4 −0.0 0.045
54815.183 22.4 0.4 −0.2 0.115
54864.230 21.5 0.4 −0.3 0.182
55069.542 18.7 0.4 0.2 0.466
55077.494 18.3 0.3 −0.1 0.477
55092.498 18.7 0.4 0.3 0.497
55800.477 18.1 0.4 −0.3 0.474
55808.508 18.4 0.4 −0.0 0.485

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table A4.  Radial-velocity Measurements for HIP 53832 along with the Uncertainties, Phases, and Residuals for the Orbital Curve

JHD Velocity σ (O–C) Phase
(2,440,000+) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1)  
52327.943 5.3 0.4 0.3 0.225
52332.842 3.5 0.3 −0.5 0.240
52363.491 −2.5 0.4 −0.3 0.335
52368.389 −3.1 0.4 0.1 0.351
52382.345 −5.6 0.3 0.2 0.394
52386.348 −6.2 0.4 0.3 0.407
52399.393 −8.9 0.3 −0.2 0.447
52403.331 −8.3 0.4 0.9 0.459
52419.264 −11.0 0.3 0.3 0.509
52423.273 −11.8 0.4 −0.1 0.522
52749.446 −11.2 0.4 1.0 0.538
52768.353 −13.5 0.4 −0.2 0.597
52785.361 −13.0 0.4 0.5 0.650
52786.390 −13.2 0.5 0.3 0.653
52953.045 7.5 0.5 −0.3 0.172
52954.042 7.4 0.5 −0.3 0.175
52961.040 6.3 0.5 −0.3 0.197
52983.050 2.2 0.4 −0.2 0.266
52987.030 2.0 0.4 0.4 0.278
53002.024 −1.6 0.4 −0.1 0.325
53706.684 −13.8 0.6 −2.2 0.520
53791.456 −10.0 1.2 −0.7 0.784
53791.464 −10.6 0.5 −1.3 0.784
53800.545 −6.8 0.6 0.7 0.813
53816.430 −1.9 0.5 1.8 0.862
53850.350 5.1 0.5 −0.1 0.968
53859.333 6.8 0.6 −0.3 0.996
53866.343 8.5 0.6 0.2 0.018
53867.335 8.6 0.5 0.1 0.021
53889.383 10.1 0.4 0.1 0.089
53899.358 9.8 0.5 0.2 0.120
53900.368 10.1 0.5 0.5 0.124
54062.027 −13.7 0.4 −0.1 0.627
54086.890 −12.4 0.5 0.2 0.705
54469.661 −1.7 0.4 −1.0 0.897

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table A5.  Radial-velocity Measurements for HIP 62827 along with the Uncertainties, Phases, and Residuals for the Orbital Curve

JHD Velocity σ (O–C) Phase
(2,440,000+) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1)  
47568.379 41.8 0.6 −0.5 0.931
47572.400 43.2 0.6 0.7 0.938
47942.398 27.3 0.8 0.1 0.587
47951.467 27.7 0.6 0.0 0.603
48297.466 37.1 0.6 0.4 0.210
48307.457 36.2 0.8 0.5 0.227
48314.390 34.2 0.7 −0.9 0.240
48321.385 34.4 0.7 −0.0 0.252
48657.462 39.0 1.1 −0.2 0.841
49038.407 25.4 0.7 −0.6 0.510
49062.369 26.3 0.6 −0.1 0.552
51305.416 25.8 0.3 −0.2 0.486
51331.370 25.8 0.5 −0.3 0.531
51969.523 29.7 0.4 0.2 0.651
51977.521 30.2 0.4 0.1 0.665
52377.482 29.1 0.4 0.3 0.366
52382.431 28.9 0.4 0.4 0.375
52768.390 41.3 0.5 −1.3 0.052
53850.435 41.8 0.6 −0.9 0.950
53859.407 44.6 0.5 1.7 0.966
54084.064 28.6 0.5 −0.5 0.360
54581.443 35.9 0.4 0.4 0.232

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Table A6.  Radial-velocity Measurements for HIP 62831 along with the Uncertainties, Phases, and Residuals for the Orbital Curve

JHD Velocity σ (O–C) Phase
(2,440,000+) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1)  
47568.344 −4.5 0.7 1.3 0.435
47572.421 −6.6 0.6 −0.9 0.437
47942.404 −3.0 0.6 0.1 0.626
47951.470 −2.2 0.6 0.8 0.630
48297.472 0.8 0.6 −0.2 0.807
48307.461 0.9 0.6 −0.2 0.812
48314.396 0.8 0.5 −0.4 0.815
48321.385 1.2 0.5 −0.0 0.819
48657.472 1.7 0.7 −0.2 0.990
49038.415 −5.8 0.7 −0.4 0.184
49062.374 −5.0 0.6 0.6 0.196
51305.421 −7.1 0.3 −0.7 0.339
51331.374 −6.4 0.5 −0.1 0.352
51969.537 −2.5 0.4 −0.4 0.677
51977.526 −2.3 0.4 −0.3 0.681
52377.475 2.6 0.4 0.0 0.885
52382.423 3.4 0.3 0.8 0.887
52768.396 −1.9 0.4 0.3 0.084
53850.442 −3.4 0.5 −0.5 0.635
53859.415 −2.1 0.5 0.7 0.639
54084.067 −0.4 0.5 −0.1 0.754
54581.447 1.1 0.4 −0.1 0.007
54582.401 1.1 0.4 −0.1 0.008

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table A7.  Radial-velocity Measurements for HIP 80769 along with the Uncertainties, Phases, and Residuals for the Orbital Curve

JHD Velocity σ (O–C) Phase
(2,440,000+) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1)  
53571.411 −190.3 0.6 −0.3 0.995
53572.403 −189.8 0.6 0.2 0.995
53602.326 −190.0 0.5 −0.7 0.010
53617.294 −187.9 0.5 1.0 0.017
53652.240 −188.1 0.7 −0.2 0.033
53850.541 −182.9 0.8 −0.8 0.126
53859.519 −181.2 0.6 0.7 0.130
53861.509 −181.9 0.6 −0.1 0.131
53867.445 −181.4 0.6 0.3 0.134
53889.468 −181.1 0.5 0.0 0.144
53899.472 −181.0 0.5 −0.1 0.149
53917.391 −181.2 0.5 −0.7 0.157
53993.278 −178.1 0.6 1.0 0.193
54244.455 −178.4 0.5 −1.3 0.311
54245.490 −176.9 0.5 0.2 0.312
54357.267 −176.8 0.5 0.4 0.364
54364.254 −175.8 0.7 1.4 0.367
54470.698 −177.7 0.8 0.1 0.417
54530.633 −178.4 0.5 −0.2 0.445
54557.558 −179.6 0.6 −1.1 0.458
54580.497 −179.0 0.5 −0.3 0.469
54672.343 −180.2 0.5 −0.6 0.512
54747.215 −179.9 0.5 0.7 0.547
54748.202 −179.7 0.5 0.9 0.548
54864.687 −182.5 0.6 −0.2 0.602
54929.537 −183.5 0.5 −0.2 0.633
55000.409 −185.0 0.5 −0.5 0.666
55069.335 −184.9 0.5 0.9 0.698
55219.698 −188.3 0.5 0.2 0.769
55266.646 −189.2 0.5 0.2 0.791
55302.534 −191.0 0.6 −1.0 0.808
55445.263 −191.4 0.5 0.4 0.875
55778.337 −188.1 0.5 −0.1 0.031
55808.314 −187.1 0.5 0.0 0.045

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Table A8.  Radial-velocity Measurements for HIP 85750 along with the Uncertainties, Phases, and Residuals for the Orbital Curve

JHD Velocity σ (O–C) Phase
(2,440,000+) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1)  
53571.384 −18.2 0.5 −0.8 0.063
53572.391 −17.9 0.5 −0.4 0.065
53617.310 −21.5 0.4 0.4 0.166
53651.218 −26.5 0.5 0.2 0.242
53652.204 −27.1 0.4 −0.3 0.244
53859.543 −30.3 0.6 −0.3 0.708
53864.520 −29.1 0.5 0.2 0.719
53889.484 −25.9 0.4 −0.3 0.775
53899.455 −24.2 0.4 −0.1 0.798
53900.430 −24.4 0.4 −0.4 0.800
53917.407 −21.3 0.4 0.4 0.838
53918.405 −21.0 0.5 0.5 0.840
53993.249 −16.9 0.4 −0.3 0.008
54244.498 −37.3 0.5 −0.5 0.571
54245.499 −36.9 0.5 −0.2 0.573
54259.436 −35.7 0.4 −0.0 0.604
54357.246 −23.2 0.5 −0.7 0.823
54364.243 −20.7 0.5 0.9 0.839
54369.236 −20.5 0.6 0.5 0.850
54557.596 −28.2 0.4 0.5 0.272
54580.563 −32.0 0.4 0.0 0.323
54600.512 −34.0 0.4 0.4 0.368
54615.494 −35.7 0.5 0.2 0.402
54643.416 −37.7 0.4 −0.1 0.464
54672.349 −37.7 0.4 −0.0 0.529
54749.190 −29.7 0.5 0.7 0.701
54929.568 −18.4 0.4 0.5 0.105
54946.562 −20.6 0.4 0.0 0.143
55013.380 −30.2 0.4 −0.1 0.293
55301.562 −17.4 0.4 0.0 0.939

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table A9.  Radial-velocity Measurements for HIP 99725 along with Phases and Residuals for the Orbital Curve

MJD Velocity (O–C) Phase
  (km s−1) (km s−1)  
53321.89 −62.6 0.0 0.172
53335.77 −62.8 +0.8 0.197
53518.06 −66.9 −0.2 0.534
53549.05 −64.6 +0.5 0.591
53569.04 −63.4 +0.4 0.628
53597.06 −62.0 −0.1 0.680
53621.96 −59.8 +0.3 0.726
53625.99 −59.4 +0.4 0.734
53670.80 −56.6 +0.5 0.816
53703.85 −55.1 +0.7 0.877
53721.80 −55.4 +0.1 0.911
53872.09 −63.6 −0.3 0.188
53909.08 −65.7 +0.1 0.257
53937.11 −67.4 −0.2 0.308
53963.00 −68.1 −0.1 0.356
53988.98 −68.0 +0.3 0.404
54032.92 −67.6 +0.1 0.486
54048.92 −67.3 −0.2 0.515
54078.77 −65.8 −0.1 0.570
54251.09 −56.0 −0.3 0.889
54300.05 −55.6 +0.4 0.979
54318.98 −56.2 +0.5 0.014
54342.05 −58.1 −0.1 0.057
54357.97 −59.2 −0.1 0.086
54377.96 −60.8 −0.2 0.123
54394.95 −61.9 0.0 0.155
54439.85 −65.3 −0.1 0.238
54482.75 −67.7 −0.3 0.317
54669.08 −62.4 +0.2 0.661
54689.03 −61.8 −0.6 0.698
54721.00 −59.3 −0.4 0.757
54740.90 −57.9 −0.2 0.794
54770.84 −57.0 −0.7 0.849
54795.84 −55.5 +0.1 0.895
54826.72 −56.2 −0.6 0.953
55064.04 −68.5 −0.2 0.391
55099.92 −68.1 −0.1 0.457
55374.08 −55.7 +0.1 0.964
55407.07 −57.1 −0.1 0.025
55438.04 −59.0 −0.1 0.082
55453.99 −60.1 0.0 0.112
55473.97 −62.1 −0.4 0.149
55510.84 −64.4 0.0 0.217
55816.97 −58.3 −0.2 0.783
55849.89 −56.6 −0.2 0.843

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table A10.  Radial-velocity Measurements for HIP 105212 along with the Uncertainties, Phases, and Residuals for the Orbital Curve

JHD Velocity σ (O–C) Phase
(2,440,000+) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1)  
53569.485 22.7 0.6 0.8 0.873
53615.404 23.1 0.5 −0.8 0.909
53651.289 25.2 0.5 −0.1 0.936
53652.298 25.5 0.5 0.1 0.937
53672.213 26.7 0.5 0.6 0.953
53675.233 25.5 0.6 −0.7 0.955
53992.345 26.6 0.6 −0.4 0.200
54037.691 25.4 0.5 −0.1 0.235
54045.592 25.7 0.4 0.5 0.241
54056.645 24.7 0.5 −0.1 0.250
54363.354 14.3 0.5 0.1 0.486
54364.332 14.1 0.5 −0.0 0.487
54672.474 14.3 0.4 −0.2 0.725
54747.259 16.8 0.5 −0.2 0.783
54748.264 17.5 0.4 0.5 0.784
54815.128 19.4 0.5 −0.3 0.835
55030.468 27.8 0.4 −0.3 0.002
55069.376 29.4 0.4 0.5 0.032
55076.397 29.3 0.4 0.3 0.037
55092.329 29.3 0.4 0.1 0.050
55120.301 29.4 0.4 −0.0 0.071
55138.229 29.3 0.4 −0.1 0.085
55778.436 12.4 0.5 −0.1 0.579
55800.467 12.4 0.6 0.0 0.596

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Footnotes

  • [A/B] = $\mathrm{log}{({N}_{{\rm{A}}}/{N}_{{\rm{B}}})}_{\star }-\mathrm{log}{({N}_{{\rm{A}}}/{N}_{{\rm{B}}})}_{\odot }$, where NA, NB is the number density of elements A and B. $\mathrm{log}\,\epsilon ({\rm{A}})$ = $\mathrm{log}({N}_{{\rm{A}}}/{N}_{{\rm{H}}})$ + 12.00, where NH is the number density of hydrogen.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/85