Physics in Mathematical Mood
Later this year, as part of the post-16 initiative of the Institute of Physics, a booklet with the above title will be published. In draft form, the booklet was discussed at the ASE conference in January. Some of the issues raised are briefly set out here. If you have any views to contribute, please write to Simon Carson at the Institute of Physics or e-mail simon.carson@physics.org.
A mathematical view of the world is intrinsically a part of physics and therefore physics should be studied in an appropriately mathematical way. However, we all know that, to some students at least, mathematics proves to be a stumbling block rather than a powerful aid to understanding. So how can we help?
Realizing that as physics teachers we need to deliver the mathematics necessary to an understanding of our subject is a start. Its corollary is that we need to find the space within the physics core. We may wish to use supplementary courses such as AS mathematics or QCA's new free-standing mathematics units, but requiring additional courses as a prerequisite to a study of A-level physics may deter students. Teaching the mathematics in context may aid understanding but we also must ensure that techniques are seen in a variety of contexts and that at some point the tool is abstracted from the background.
As teachers we need to be aware of the very basic mathematical difficulties that students bring with them: the use of calculators, standard form, simple algebraic manipulation, for example. Mathematical arguments need to be developed fully and carefully. Encouraging cooperation and discussion between students may help the less able to understand and the more able to appreciate and develop their own understanding through making explicit their reasoning by explaining it to others.
And what of new technology? Software tools allow students to develop their understanding about graphs, for example, enabling them to investigate the characteristics of particular functions. Modelling tools allow teachers or students to build models or more simply to create animations to demonstrate the properties of mathematical entities such as vectors. Graphical calculators mean that all students can have cheap access to such tools and it may be that some of the analytical mathematical tools we hold so dear are obsolete.
Other issues are discussed in the booklet and were aired at the ASE conference: the situation in HE, the approach to mathematics taken by the Salters Horners approach, ways to introduce special functions such as exponentials, ways of thinking about the relationships between variables as expressed in equations. Many practical suggestions are made in the booklet about how we can help and support students and, most importantly, how we can communicate to them some of the beauty and pleasure of Physics in Mathematical Mood.
Simon Carson
A perspective on apparatus
The effective deployment of apparatus is one technique available in physics that does not exist in some other areas of teaching. We should capitalize on this. Apparatus is a tool that can be used to enable thinking and learning. There are a number of purposes to be served by the effective use of apparatus. It is no more likely that apparatus will `teach' any more than nature `teaches' physics in the first place. Discussion and the creative interpretation of observation are both necessary to the sense-making process. Apparatus must be chosen with these opportunities in mind.
In a demonstration we are trying to persuade students that the world behaves in a particular way. An attempt is being made to persuade students that a particular conception of the world is worth considering and that this conception is a fruitful and truthful picture of the world. Apparatus chosen for this purpose must have clear links between what is to be measured and the representations of that measurement. The art of demonstration is very much like a magician's show, in that it must all be well rehearsed and produce surprising and convincing results with apparently little effort.
Students will be asked to engage in exploration and explanation using apparatus. Apparatus chosen for this purpose must not look as if it has been designed to give one specific answer. Students must feel confident that they can manipulate apparatus in such a way that the apparatus can serve to express their thoughts and be shaped to try out their hypotheses. Students will also be asked to engage in more traditional laboratory work that requires precision and a careful approach. Here the apparatus must be of sufficient quality and perceived modernity to allow the students to take the tasks seriously so that they will produce work of the expected quality.
A final use for apparatus is to allow students to engage in genuine open-ended investigation where their knowledge of physics both informs their plans before work is carried out and interprets the observations and measurements from that work. Here apparatus that measures well is at a premium. The connection between manipulating the system to be measured and the resultant measurement must involve short-term feedback loops: the students must see how the system is behaving. A necessary consequence of this requirement is that the measurements are presented in a form that makes physical sense. This may imply a good deal of processing of the raw data before the number is displayed. It is in this area of measurement that we see the greatest potential for the integration of IT into laboratory practice.
Apparatus worth developing. From this analysis and from the experience of trying to make its current practicals work it seems that we need to concentrate our development of apparatus in two areas. The first is to ensure that equipment which provides a range of a high quality, attractive and effective measurement tools is in place. In this area we can expect to see the exploitation of developments in information and sensor technology lead to new approaches which open up many possibilities. The second thrust must be to have a good supply of apparatus which can be can assembled and manipulated by students to suit their thoughts and purposes. This apparatus may well be rather simple and need not to be very expensive. This may compensate for some of the implied expense of the first thrust above. Alongside these two there will continue to be steady development of traditional apparatus, often used for a demonstration.
Affording apparatus. The key to developing the apparatus within a department must be to look towards fewer items, each of which can perform more tasks, deployed as measurement tools. In this the increasing computing power available, often at a small cost, can be deployed intelligently. Following a practice elsewhere we must expect most of this development to take place in software, not the hardware. This has clear implications for the apparatus manufacturers. Low costs in computing have followed from the adoption of the widespread standards that enable one device to be used for many purposes. A similar development seems likely in the provision of apparatus. Some elements are likely to prove expensive. Compensating for the use of these expensive elements will then prove to be the challenge which makes the whole package affordable.
Building up a department. Out of the post-16 initiative will come some thoughts developed from Advancing Physics that show how we can move from the current provision. New and effectively deployed apparatus can lead to an improvement in teaching and learning and in students' perceptions of physics.
Ian Lawrence