The papers in this special issue were invited from contributors to theSixth International Meeting
on Fully Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction in Radiology and
Nuclear Medicine held at Pacific Grove, California, USA
(30 October - 2 November 2001).
This was the sixth in a series of biennial meetings with the aim of
bringing together people actively researching problems related to fully
three-dimensional tomography in radiology and nuclear medicine. The
previous five meetings have been held at Corsendonk, Belgium (1991);
Snowbird, Utah, USA (1993); Aix-les-Bains, France (1995); Laurel Highlands,
Pennsylvania, USA (1997); and Egmond aan Zee, the Netherlands (1999).
To encourage discussions and the exchange of ideas and techniques, the
Asilomar Conference Center with its relaxed setting was chosen for 2001.
Approximately 110 participants were in attendance. Tuition support was
provided for all students who applied.
There were 84 abstracts submitted to the meeting. Of these, 27 were chosen
for oral sessions (35 minute presentations, including discussion) and 26
were chosen for poster sessions. A keynote address entitled `Why Do
Patients and Their Care-Givers Need 3D and 4D Imaging?' was delivered by
Thomas F Budinger.
Authors of the 53 presentations were invited to submit manuscripts for this
special issue of Physics in Medicine and Biology. Of these,
35 were
submitted of which 19 were accepted for publication.
Shortly before the 2001 meeting we learned of the passing of our dear
friend and colleague, Paul Edholm. A short remembrance of the man and his
contributions follows this editorial.
Finally, I would like to thank those, in addition to the participants, who
made this meeting a success. Our International Scientific Committee,
Supplementary Manuscript Reviewers, and Sponsors are listed below, as is the Local
Organizing Committee. Of special note are Martin S Boswell and Michelle K
Huesman, whose tireless efforts made my job significantly easier.
R H Huesman
Special Issue Editor
Local Organizing Committee at the Center for Functional Imaging, LBL
Ronald H Huesman
Gregory J Klein
Jinyi Qi
Bryan W Reutter
Martin S Boswell
Michelle K Huesman
Hilma C Johnsen
Thomas F Budinger
International Scientific Committee
Dale Bailey, Guy's Hospital, London, England
Harrison H Barrett, University of Arizona, USA
Freek Beekman, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands
Thomas F Budinger, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, USA
Irene Buvat, U494 INSERM, Paris, France
Anna Celler, Vancouver Hospital, Canada
Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Michel Defrise, Free University of Brussels, Belgium
Jeffrey A Fessler, University of Michigan, USA
Pierre Grangeat, LETI/CEA, Grenoble, France
Grant T Gullberg, University of Utah, USA
Ronald H Huesman, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, USA
Ronald J Jaszczak, Duke University, USA
Paul E Kinahan, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Gregory J Klein, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, USA
Hiroyuki Kudo, University of Tsukuba, Japan
Christian Michel, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Steve R Meikle, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia
Jinyi Qi, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, USA
Bryan W Reutter, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, USA
Vesna Sossi, UBC/TRIUMF, Vancouver, Canada
David W Townsend, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Benjamin M W Tsui, University of North Carolina, USA
Gengsheng L Zeng, University of Utah, USA
Supplementary Manuscript Reviewers
James E Bowsher, Duke University, USA
David Brasse, University of Pittsburgh, USA
Rolf Clackdoyle, University of Utah, USA
Richard M Leahy, University of Southern California, USA
Scott D Metzler, Duke University, USA
Frederic Noo, University of Utah, USA
Katsuyuki Taguchi, Toshiba Corp, Japan
Sponsors
CTI, Inc.
GE Medical Systems
ADAC Laboratories
Apple Computer, Inc.
US Department of Energy Office of Science
Host
Center for Functional Imaging, EO Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory
Paul Edholm in memoriam
Our friend and colleague Professor Paul (Palle) Edholm passed away on 9 October
2001. He was born 1926, got his MD from the Karolinska Institue in
Stockholm in 1960, and was appointed Professor of Radiology at Linköping
University in 1970.
In hindsight many of us can't say when and why we chose
a specific branch or problem as our research interest. Not so with Paul.
Some time in the 1950s he had his first encounter with classical linear
tomo-synthesis and after that his mind was set. He became absolutely
fascinated by the problem of ridding these tomograms of the shadows cast
onto the plane in focus by neighbouring planes. He constantly pursued
possible solutions presented in 1960 in his thesis `The tomogram, its formation
and content'. Not many colleagues in his native country, MDs and PhDs
alike, could follow or appreciate his work at this time. Paul pushed ahead
single-handedly, keeping an eye on the international developments. He began
to consider another data set, which he later coined the sinogram. Always
aware of the practical side of things, he felt that the processing of these
data, including the necessary filtering step, had to be done by optical
means. From his manuscripts in the late 1960s to early 1970s it is clear
that he was quite close to a complete understanding of what is now known as
the filtered back-projection reconstruction method.
While struggling with
his mechanical-optical designs he received the news from EMI in England
about the first computer-aided tomography scanner, the importance of which
he understood immediately. For many years he became the most wanted
lecturer in Sweden on radiology and medical imaging. And he was more than
pleased when his alma mater Karolinska in 1979 decided to give the Nobel
prize in medicine and physiology to the inventors of CT.
After his arrival
in Linköping in the early 1970s his creative mind started to generate
several new ideas. One of these was coined ectomography. Instead of the
linear movement in classical tomography, the x-ray source in ectomography
moves in a plane above the patient, under which 2D-projections are
captured on film. This scanning geometry was later carried over to a SPECT
camera design with a slanted and rotating collimator. In the mid 1980s he
conceived the linogram, which can be seen as an unconventional sampling of
the Radon space. A useful feature of the linogram is that the samples in
the Fourier domain appear along concentric squares instead of circles as in
the sinogram case. Much of this work came about during his sabbaticals with
the Medical Image Processing Group at the University of Pennsylvania and in
collaboration with members of that group. The frequency-distance transform
also stems from this time period. During rotation, points of a flat object
that reside on a line parallel to the detector, all have the same velocity
vector projected onto the detector. Hence, the sinusoids of these points in
the sinogram will at this instant have the same slope. Therefore, in the 2D
Fourier transform of the sinogram, called the F2S-data space, the
contributions originating from object points lined up at a certain distance
from the detector will appear along a line through origin in F2S!
The
1990s were Paul's last decade as a scientist. He spent this period mostly
with the EE-department at Linköping University to the benefit of many
PhD-students and colleagues alike. His lectures on CT, MRI, optical
illusions
and many other subjects used to keep the audience spellbound. His modest
personality, his sense of humour, and the consistency he showed in pursuing
a problem made him a wonderful team-player in this new environment. In
spite of an eye defect that prevented him from using true stereovision, his
ability to see and think in three dimensions was outstanding. His approach
was always to reduce as much as possible to pure geometry.
To travel with
Paul was an intellectual joy. He could recite long passages of Ulysses by
heart. Digressions on technology in the Roman Empire went along with
explanations on why the sunlight under tall trees comes in circular patches
but appears as waving lines on a sandy water bed. More than anything else,
however, the living kingdom and its astounding diversity kept him
fascinated throughout his life. He lived and died as a genuine Darwinist.
To him it was self-evident that no man is anything but a small part of
Nature's great cycle.
Per-Erik Danielsson