Erratum: Thermodynamic perturbation theory in studies of metal melts

Original review: Russ. Chem. Rev. 83 (11) 987 – 1002 (2014) DOI 10.1070/RCR4410

Page	Column	Line	Printed	Should be read
989	right	5th below Eqn (30)	Structural parameters	Structure functions
993	left	8th below Eqn (64)	...negative contributions.	... negative contribution.
994	right	3rd paragraph from the top	Kitamura¹¹²^– ¹¹⁴ used expression (82) with a Young – Rogers correction⁵⁴ instead of the $\Delta S_{\text{IP}}$ term [see Eqn (83)] to construct the effective pair interaction for the description of mercury by combining...	Kitamura¹¹² ^– ¹¹⁴ used expression (82) with a Young – Rogers correction⁵⁴ instead of the $\Delta S_{\text{IP}}$ term [see Eqn (83)]. The effective pair interaction for the description of mercury was constructed in this work by combining...
998	left	the second part of the sentence before Eqn (91)	... its extension to binary mixtures, which was proposed by Jacobs and Andersen¹⁹⁰ (JA) for metals and includes a correction, $S_{0{\text{WCA}}}(q)$ :	... extended to binary mixtures Jacobs and Andersen¹⁹⁰ (JA) modification of the WCA which was suggested especially for metals and lies in the correction of $S_{0{\text{WCA}}}(q)$ :
998	right	below Eqn (92)	The authors of Refs 230 and 231 reported the results obtained for the structure factors and calculated the thermodynamic properties, but the computational procedure was not described.	The authors of Refs 230 and 231 calculated the structure factors and reported also the results for the thermodynamic properties, but in the last case the computational procedure was not described.

Article metrics