Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
One important indicator of the adequacy of a numerical solution of an autonomous system of differential equations is the topological conjugacy of the discrete model obtained to the time-one shift map of the original flow. The most significant results in this direction have been obtained for structurally stable flows. In particular, it was shown in [1] and [2] that the Runge–Kutta discretization of a Morse–Smale flow () without periodic trajectories on the -disk is topologically conjugate to the time-one shift (for a sufficiently small step size). In this connection the question, going back to Palis [3], of necessary and sufficient conditions for embedding a Morse–Smale diffeomorphism in a topological flow arises naturally.
Recall that a diffeomorphism on a closed manifold is called a Morse–Smale diffeomorphism if its non-wandering set is finite and consists of hyperbolic periodic points, and for any two points the intersection of the stable manifold of and the unstable manifold of is transversal. In [3] the following necessary conditions for embedding a Morse–Smale diffeomorphism in a topological flow were stated, and we call them the Palis conditions: 1) the non-wandering set coincides with the set of fixed points; 2) the restriction of the diffeomorphism to each invariant manifold of each fixed point preserves its orientation; 3) if for any distinct saddle points the intersection is non-empty, then it contains no compact connected components.
According to [3], in the case when these conditions are not only necessary but also sufficient. In [4] examples of Morse–Smale diffeomorphisms on the three-dimensional sphere were constructed that satisfy the Palis conditions but do not embed in topological flows, and also necessary and sufficient conditions were obtained for embedding a three-dimensional Morse–Smale diffeomorphism in a topological flow. An additional obstruction to embedding such diffeomorphisms in topological flows is connected with the possibility of a non- trivial embedding of the separatrices of saddle points in the ambient manifold. In the present paper we show that for the class of Morse–Smale diffeomorphisms without heteroclinic intersections defined on the sphere of dimension and satisfying the Palis conditions no such obstruction exists and the following theorem holds.
Theorem 1. Any diffeomorphism , , is embedded in a topological flow.
The main tool of the proof is the scheme of a diffeomorphism, defined below. Let . It follows from the connection between the dynamics of the diffeomorphism and the homologies of the sphere that for any saddle point of either the stable or the unstable manifold has dimension 1. Denote by and the unions of the closures of the unstable and the stable one-dimensional invariant manifolds of the saddle points, respectively; if has no saddle points with one-dimension unstable (stable) manifolds, then it has a unique sink (source) fixed point, which we also denote by (). Let . According to [5], the sets , , and are connected, and is an attractor, is a repeller, and consists of the wandering points of going from to and contains all the saddle separatrices of codimension 1.
Denote by the orbit space of the -action on , by the natural projection, and by the epimorphism induced by . Let and denote the unions of the projections onto of all the stable and unstable separatrices of the saddle points, respectively. The set is called the scheme of the diffeomorphism . The schemes and of diffeomorphisms are said to be equivalent if there exists a homeomorphism with the following properties: 1) ; 2) and .
According to [6], the scheme is a complete topological invariant for diffeomorphisms in . The key and most non-trivial point for embedding a diffeomorphism , , in a flow is the equivalence of the scheme to the following standard object. Let be a flow on defined by the formula , let be the time-one shift along trajectories of , let be the orbit space of the -action on (which is diffeomorphic to ), and let be the natural projection. On the unit sphere we choose smooth pairwise disjoint -spheres . Let and . We choose an integer and let and . The set is called the standard scheme.
Lemma. The scheme of a diffeomorphism , , is equivalent to the standard scheme for some and .
This lemma allows one to use the method in [4] to construct a flow whose time-one shift has a scheme equivalent to . Since the scheme is a complete invariant, there exists a homeomorphism such that . Hence is embedded in the flow .