HIGH-RESOLUTION FOURIER TRANSFORM SPECTROSCOPY OF Nb i IN THE NEAR-INFRARED

, , , , , , and

Published 2015 October 30 © 2015. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation A. Er et al 2015 ApJS 221 14 DOI 10.1088/0067-0049/221/1/14

0067-0049/221/1/14

ABSTRACT

In this study, a Fourier Transform spectrum of Niobium (Nb) is investigated in the near-infrared spectral range from 6000 to 12,000 cm−1 (830–1660 nm). The Nb spectrum is produced using a hollow cathode discharge lamp in an argon atmosphere. Both Nb and Ar spectral lines are visible in the spectrum. A total of 110 spectral lines are assigned to the element Nb. Of these lines, 90 could be classified as transitions between known levels of atomic Nb. From these classified Nb i transitions, 27 have not been listed in literature previously. Additionally, 8 lines are classified for the first time.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

The hyperfine structure and classification of spectral lines of niobium (Nb) are important in astrophysics for the determination of elemental abundances in stellar atmospheres, as already discussed in Kröger et al. (2010).

Nb, with atomic number 41, is a transition metal and possesses only one stable isotope, 93Nb. This isotope has a nuclear spin of I = 9/2. Due to the large nuclear magnetic dipole moment ${\mu }_{I}$ = $6.1705(3){\mu }_{N}$ (Lederer & Shirley 1978), the spectrum of 93Nb shows a broad hyperfine structure, which is clearly visible in most lines even in Doppler-broadened spectra, for example, as in Fourier Transform (FT) spectra. The influence of the electric quadrupole interaction on the hyperfine structure is small for this isotope and can mostly be neglected in Doppler-broadened spectra.

The fine structure and the hyperfine structure of Nb have been the subject of several experimental investigations (see Kröger et al. 2010 and references therein). Although extensive studies have been performed, all of the wavelength lists compiled thus far for Nb have been limited to wavelengths below 1100 nm.

A very early, but still very important, work on the classification of Nb spectrum was performed by Humphreys & Meggers (1945).4 They recorded the spectrum of Nb from 200 to 1100 nm and identified 3313 lines of neutral atom Nb as well as 1723 lines of singly ionized Nb. From the 3313 atomic lines, they classified 2836 as combinations among 364 atomic energy levels; from the 1723 ionic lines, they classified 1494 as combinations of 183 ionic energy levels. In this reference, the 364 atomic and 183 ionic levels are given with their total electronic angular momentum quantum number J, spectral terms, and configurations, and they have served as the basis for all subsequent investigations of Nb. These data are complemented and in a few cases revised by new energy levels from Kröger et al. (2004, 2007) and Öztürk et al. (2015).

The aim of the present work is to extend the wavelength range of the Nb spectral line list to the near-infrared up to 1660 nm in order to provide a basis for future astrophysical investigations.

2. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS

In our experiments, Nb vapor was generated in a hollow cathode lamp that was cooled with liquid nitrogen in order to reduce Doppler broadening. A 20 mm long hollow copper cylinder served as the cathode. The hole had an internal diameter of 3 mm and was covered by a 0.125 mm thick Nb foil. The hollow cathode lamp was filled with argon at a pressure of approximately 3 mbar. The discharge was running at a current of 50 mA. For more details on the hollow cathode lamp, see Messnarz & Guthöhrlein (2000).

Using the high-resolution Bruker IFS 125 HR FT spectrometer and an InGaAs diode as a detector, the spectrum was recorded in the range from 830 to 1660 nm (6000 to 12,000 cm−1). The experiments took place at the Laser Centre of the University of Latvia. The entrance aperture of the spectrometer was set as 2 mm resulting in a spectral resolution of 0.05 cm−1 in the IR wavelength range. This resolution was chosen as low in order to increase the signal-to-noise ratio ${\rm{(S/N)}}$ and detect weak spectral lines.

We checked the accuracy of the measured wavenumbers in the FT spectra by choosing those lines in our FT spectrum that had been previously classified as Ar lines by comparing their frequencies with the corresponding differences of the Ar energy levels, which were taken from Minnhagen (1973) and Palmeri & Biémont (1995) for the atom and from Saloman (2010) for the first ion. The mean value of the difference between the values from the experiment and from the literature for all of the more than 350 classified Ar lines is 0.0002 cm−1; the maximum deviation does not exceed 0.004 cm−1. Thus, the calibration of the FT spectrometer was confirmed. The achieved accuracy is better than 0.004 cm−1 in the wavelength range from 830 to 1 660 nm.

The relative line intensity is not calibrated for the instrumental response. Instead, only the S/N is determined, which depends on the line intensity but is not proportional because the area within the spectral profile is not taken into account. The S/N values given in the present work correspond to the amplitude of the highest peak of a line.

In Figure 1, a representative portion of the spectrum is presented which shows four Nb lines as well as a few ionic Ar lines.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Representative part of the Fourier Transform spectrum of the Nb–Ar plasma.

Standard image High-resolution image

We estimated the line pattern width W as a distance measured at points where the intensity had fallen by a factor $1/{e}^{2}$ with respect to the maximum. If the S/N was lower than eight, the width was defined as the distance between the points where the line profile rises above the noise level.

3. CLASSIFICATION METHOD

In the spectrum of the Nb–Ar plasma, both niobium and argon lines were observed. The program Class_lw (Windholz & Guthöhrlein 2003) was used to classify the spectral lines. This program is based on a list of all of the known fine structure levels of atomic and ionic Nb and Ar, which includes information about the total electronic angular momentum J and the parity, as well as the available magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole hyperfine structure constants A and B, respectively. Information about the fine structure levels comes from Humphreys & Meggers (1945), Kröger et al. (2004, 2007), and Öztürk et al. (2015) for Nb and from Minnhagen (1973), Palmeri & Biémont (1995), and Saloman (2010) for Ar. The hyperfine structure constants A and B for Nb i were taken from Büttgenbach et al. (1975), Büttgenbach & Dicke (1975), Fraenkel et al. (1988), Singh & Rao (1989), Singh et al. (1992), Bouzed et al. (2003), Kröger & Bouzed (2003), Kröger et al. (2004, 2010), Kröger (2007), Başar et al. (2008, 2013), Er et al. (2011), and Öztürk et al. (2015), and for the Nb ii from Nilsson & Ivarsson (2008). The most current Nb level list contains 382 Nb i levels and 185 Nb ii levels. Hyperfine structure data are available for 220 Nb i levels (104 levels with A and B constants and 116 levels only with A constants) and 53 Nb ii levels.

The classification program calculates all of the possible transitions which meet the selection rules for optical dipole transitions and lie within a predefined wavenumber interval around the approximate experimental center of gravity of the line. For this wavenumber interval, we have chosen the value of±0.1 cm−1.

The hyperfine structure of the line, which can be simulated using a Gaussian profile with the classification program, served as a fingerprint that allowed us to confirm or disprove a predicted transition. For all of the classified Nb lines, the magnetic dipole hyperfine structure constants A of both levels of the transition were known. In about a quarter of the cases, more than one level combinations were predicted by the classification program for a particular spectral line. In these cases, the hyperfine structure was the decisive criterion for the classification choice.

The simulated hyperfine spectrum, shown in a graphic window together with the experimental curve, can be shifted along the wavenumber axis until the simulated and measured curves coincide. In this way the center of gravity can be precisely determined from the FT spectrum. An example of a simulated hyperfine structure is shown in Figure 2. With this procedure, the center of gravity of the line can be determined very accurately, i.e., with an uncertainty of 0.003 cm−1. As long as the S/N is higher than four, the accuracy of the center of gravity is almost independent of the S/N ratio. If we assume a systematic calibration error of 0.004 cm−1, the absolute wavenumber accuracy of the center of gravity is better than 0.007 cm−1. Such accuracy corresponds to 0.5 pm at 830 nm and 1.9 pm at 1660 nm, respectively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Example of a simulated and an experimental hyperfine structure pattern for the line at $\lambda =962.6908\;{\rm{nm}}$ or ${\sigma }_{{\rm{vac}}}=10,384.703$ cm−1. Here, both curves overlap perfectly. Vertical bars depict the relative intensities of a particular hyperfine transition.

Standard image High-resolution image

Using our experimental setup and operating conditions, the Doppler widths of the lines are of the same order of magnitude as the resolution of the FT spectrometer. By applying convolution of the instrumental width of the FT spectrometer with the Doppler width, the FWHM of the hyperfine components takes a value between 0.08 cm−1 at 12,000 cm−1 and 0.06 cm−1 at 6000 cm−1. In the present analysis, very few of the classified Nb lines appear to be fully resolved, while most of the lines are only partially resolved and some are even unresolved.

The lines with only one symmetrical peak are generally Ar lines, but they may also be Nb lines with a narrow hyperfine pattern. To further improve the identification of Ar lines, a list of Ar lines resulting from the analysis of an FT spectrum of Ar–lanthanum plasma (Güzelçimen et al. 2013) were used for comparison. For a number of narrow lines with only one symmetrical peak, no classification could be found. If they do not appear in the La–Ar spectrum, then it is not clear whether these lines are Nb or Ar lines; in any case, a number of unknown levels are observed.

4. RESULTS

In our FT spectrum, more than 800 lines could be observed, the majority of which are Ar lines. In Table 1, which contains 210 entries, a list of all classified Nb lines and all unclassified lines is provided. Those lines unambiguously identified as Ar lines (atomic and ionic) are not listed in the present paper. For anyone interested in a table of Ar lines, we refer to the list resulting from our measurements of La–Ar plasma (Güzelçimen et al. 2013).

Table 1.  List of Nb Lines From 6000 to 12,000 cm−1 Classified in the Present FT Spectrum

W ${\rm{\Delta }}{W}_{{\rm{hfs}}}$ S/R int ${\lambda }_{{\rm{air}}}$ ${\sigma }_{{\rm{vac}}}$ ${\rm{\Delta }}\sigma $ Comment Element ${E}_{{\rm{e}}}$ ${J}_{{\rm{e}}}$ ${E}_{{\rm{o}}}$ ${J}_{{\rm{o}}}$ npt
(mK) (mK)   from (1) (nm) (cm−1) (cm−1)     (cm−1)   (cm−1)    
171 3 833.506 11,994.22 Nb or Ar
179 −21 18 60 834.6078 11,978.383 0.097 Nb i 11,044.08 9/2 23,022.56 7/2 1
426 8 834.805 11,975.56 Nb
601 −214 3 20 835.0033 11,972.710 0.010 Nb i 8410.90 1/2 20,383.62 3/2 1
586 581 7 839.2358 11,912.328 0.072 b Nb i 20,060.84 7/2 31,973.24 7/2 1
763 −712 3 15c 840.6252 11,892.639 −0.019 b Nb i 15,467.08 5/2 27,359.70 5/2 1
140 −99 3 5 841.4747 11,880.633 0.047 Nb i 10,126.06 1/2 22,006.74 1/2 1
348 240 3 25c 843.9775 11,845.402 −0.052 Nb i 12,357.70 9/2 24,203.05 11/2 1
1102 1013 12 150c 847.5989 11,794.792 0.048 Nb i 9043.14 5/2 20,837.98 5/2 1
617 4 850.376 11,756.27 Nb
193 97 16 50 852.6995 11,724.239 0.051 Nb i 10,922.74 7/2 22,647.03 5/2 1
668 −465 6 20c 854.7261 11,696.441 0.019 Nb i 8410.90 1/2 20,107.36 1/2 4
593 369 8 30c 856.0555 11,678.277 0.023 Nb i 8705.32 3/2 20,383.62 3/2 1
481 3 856.500 11,672.21 Nb
567 −352 2 30c 857.5850 11,657.449 −0.039 Nb i 12,357.70 9/2 24,015.11 7/2 1
1068 −847 3 20c 861.4438 11,605.230 −0.010 Nb i 16,828.52 9/2 28,433.74 9/2 1
203 3 865.018 11,557.27 Nb or Ar
555 −390 4 40c 869.7548 11,494.336 −0.006 Nb i 13,012.20 11/2 24,506.53 9/2 1
418 264 2 4 871.7066 11,468.600 0.010 nc Nb i 19,556.91 9/2 31,025.52 7/2 1
306 −74 8 20 874.0953 11,437.259 0.021 Nb i 12,136.86 7/2 23,574.14 5/2 1
233 −104 13 12 876.7971 11,402.016 0.024 Nb i 8705.32 3/2 20,107.36 1/2 1
359 299 3 7c 876.9580 11,399.924 −0.014 Nb i 12,136.86 7/2 23,536.77 9/2 2
274 −111 3 7 879.9742 11,360.849 −0.029 Nb i 13,145.71 9/2 24,506.53 9/2 2
966 542 13 100c 881.5568 11,340.454 0.026 b Nb i 9043.14 5/2 20,383.62 3/2 5
1286 1151 13 100c 881.5612 11,340.397 0.063 b Nb i 9497.52 7/2 20,837.98 5/2 5
639 593 2 4 889.6274 11,237.576 −0.026 Nb i 12,288.25 3/2 23,525.80 3/2 1
967 1584 2 889.7275 11,236.311 0.049 Nb i 9497.52 7/2 20,733.88 9/2 2
122 52 14 20 890.5780 11,225.580 0.040 Nb i 12,018.25 5/2 23,243.87 3/2 1
707 −48 4 4c 891.5769 11,213.003 0.057 Nb i 8410.90 1/2 19,623.96 1/2 1
444 74 5 6 893.3421 11,190.847 0.003 Nb i 13,012.20 11/2 24,203.05 11/2 1
778 −645 2 20c 895.9757 11,157.954 0.026 Nb i 15,282.35 7/2 26,440.33 9/2 2
266 −80 3 7 901.1768 11,093.556 −0.016 nc Nb i 19,931.98 5/2 31,025.52 7/2 1
611 533 3 8 903.9240 11,059.841 0.019 Nb i 8705.32 3/2 19,765.18 3/2 1
437 353 2 2 904.1267 11,057.361 −0.021 Nb i 13,145.71 9/2 24,203.05 11/2 1
272 3 906.030 11,034.13 Nb
354 32 6 20c 906.1457 11,032.724 0.006 Nb i 12,982.38 7/2 24,015.11 7/2 1
176 3 906.602 11,027.17 Nb
797 514 3 7 908.4910 11,004.243 0.067 Nb i 12,018.25 5/2 23,022.56 7/2 1
215 −9 3 909.7853 10,988.588 0.022 Nb i 12,018.25 5/2 23,006.86 3/2 1
237 136 2 7 911.7737 10,964.624 0.056 nc Nb i 20,060.84 7/2 31,025.52 7/2 1
1288 1029 7 10c 912.9420 10,950.592 0.048 Nb i 9043.14 5/2 19,993.78 5/2 1
748 511 7 50c 914.1344 10,936.308 0.042 Nb i 16,918.78 7/2 27,855.13 7/2 1
226 4 917.754 10,893.17 a Nb or Ar
489 146 6 20 918.6960 10,882.007 0.013 Nb i 12,692.12 5/2 23,574.14 5/2 1
422 −244 3 15 919.7620 10,869.394 0.006 Nb i 13,145.71 9/2 24,015.11 7/2 2
98 6 924.061 10,818.82 Nb or Ar
1662 1474 7 924.1179 10,818.161 0.059 Nb i 9497.52 7/2 20,315.74 7/2 1
711 469 11 40c 932.3605 10,722.523 0.057 Nb i 8705.32 3/2 19,427.9 5/2 6
102 5 934.163 10,701.84 Nb or Ar
93 5 934.243 10,700.92 a Nb or Ar
257 −79 10 10 935.3188 10,688.609 0.041 Nb i 11,318.09 3/2 22,006.74 1/2 1
505 −225 23 20 940.8631 10,625.623 0.027 Nb i 8410.90 1/2 19,036.55 3/2 2
323 −80 3 4 941.2410 10,621.357 0.043 Nb i 15,439.25 3/2 26,060.65 5/2 1
272 −136 4 8h 943.8704 10,591.769 −0.009 Nb i 12,982.38 7/2 23,574.14 5/2 1
344 227 4 4 947.2084 10,554.443 −0.053 Nb i 12,982.38 7/2 23,536.77 9/2 1
414 −212 3 5 947.4539 10,551.708 0.042 Nb i 12,692.12 5/2 23,243.87 3/2 1
819 302 2 8c 954.9187 10,469.224 0.016 Nb i 15,460.77 1/2 25,930.01 3/2 1
1386 1338 21 60c 959.5115 10,419.112 0.058 Nb i 9497.52 7/2 19,916.69 7/2 6
430 −50 12 10 962.0980 10,391.101 −0.041 Nb i 13,145.71 9/2 23,536.77 9/2 1
963 892 37 100c 962.6908 10,384.703 0.057 Nb i 9043.14 5/2 19,427.90 5/2 3
550 −465 39 50c 963.1142 10,380.137 0.053 Nb i 8410.90 1/2 18,791.09 1/2 2
335 248 13 12 965.1002 10,358.777 0.003 Nb i 12,288.25 3/2 22,647.03 5/2 2
421 341 46 50 967.6769 10,331.194 0.036 Nb i 8705.32 3/2 19,036.55 3/2 1
314 148 4 4 967.7546 10,330.365 0.075 b Nb i 12,692.12 5/2 23,022.56 7/2 1
228 54 6 982.5590 10,174.716 −0.006 Nb i 19,034.71 7/2 29,209.42 7/2 1
276 3 985.001 10,149.49 Nb
387 264 2 5 989.6633 10,101.677 0.023 Nb i 18,332.04 11/2 28,433.74 9/2 1
404 248 4 20 991.0349 10,087.696 0.024 nc, b Nb i 23,048.58 11/2 33,136.3 9/2 2
212 −103 43 25 991.2300 10,085.710 0.060 Nb i 8705.32 3/2 18,791.09 1/2 1
388   3 994.357 10,053.00 Nb
346 −156 9 15 995.7310 10,040.120 0.060 Nb i 12,982.38 7/2 23,022.56 7/2 1
430 3 998.856 10,008.71 Nb  
691 513 27 30c 1000.3886 9993.375 0.035 Nb i 9043.14 5/2 19,036.55 3/2 4
500 312 4 2 1001.9443 9977.859 0.041 Nb i 16,918.78 7/2 26,896.68 7/2 1
402 −348 7 10c 1004.2563 9954.888 0.022 Nb i 12,692.12 5/2 22,647.03 5/2 1
1174 1028 11 20c 1006.7425 9930.304 0.076 Nb i 9497.52 7/2 19,427.9 5/2 1
512 441 2 5c 1008.445 9913.53 Nb i 16,918.78 7/2 26,832.43 7/2 1
157 123 2 4 1011.0026 9888.460 0.040 nc Nb i 23,010.58 9/2 32,899.08 7/2 3
83 4 1017.433 9825.96 a Nb or Ar
585 −480 3 10c 1018.1443 9819.099 0.061 Nb i 18,035.97 9/2 27,855.13 7/2 1
675 5 1020.365 9797.73 Nb
92 8 1025.744 9746.35 a Nb or Ar
80 6 1028.981 9715.69 a Nb or Ar
419 4 1035.967 9650.18 Nb
570 3 1038.368 9627.86 Nb
119 3 1039.411 9618.20 Nb or Ar
273 4 1043.380 9581.61 Nb
119 13 1044.778 9568.78 Nb or Ar
426 377 2 3 1045.2586 9564.389 0.041 nc Nb i 22,936.90 7/2 32,501.33 7/2 1
85 11 1047.314 9545.62 Nb or Ar
290 4 1050.056 9520.69 Nb
327 6 1054.924 9476.76 Nb
163 4 1061.825 9415.16 Nb or Ar
408 −306 3 4 1063.6449 9399.059 −0.029 nc Nb i 19,034.71 7/2 28,433.74 9/2 1
579 431 2 1066.3414 9375.291 0.029 Nb i 12,136.86 7/2 21,512.18 7/2 1
211 4 1077.714 9276.36 Nb or Ar
183 62 6 2 1086.3194 9202.875 0.005 nc Nb i 22,936.9 7/2 32,139.78 5/2 1
280 −19 12 1092.0561 9154.531 −0.051 Nb i 12,357.7 9/2 21,512.18 7/2 1
70 5 1121.732 8912.35 Nb or Ar
170 100 15 1126.2232 8876.804 0.026 b Nb i 19,556.91 9/2 28,433.74 9/2 1
260 −46 8 1133.4230 8820.416 0.004 Nb i 19,034.71 7/2 27,855.13 7/2 1
266 −5 6 1140.8867 8762.713 0.017 Nb i 19,034.71 7/2 27,797.44 5/2 1
142 3 1154.509 8659.32 Nb or Ar
137 36 6 1157.481 8637.09 Nb or Ar
156 3 1158.192 8631.79 Nb or Ar
170 4 1159.240 8623.98 Nb or Ar
87 4 1160.882 8611.78 Nb or Ar
135 4 1160.910 8611.58 Nb or Ar
85 5 1161.176 8609.60 a Nb or Ar
122 4 1161.339 8608.39 a Nb or Ar
127 4 1162.792 8597.64 Nb or Ar
374 4 1163.359 8593.45 Nb
75 3 1163.595 8591.70 Nb
89 5 1163.976 8588.89 Nb or Ar
192 35 3 1165.2597 8579.429 −0.039 Nb i 19,034.71 7/2 27,614.1 5/2 1
196 4 1168.395 8556.41 Nb or Ar
124 3 1168.686 8554.28 Nb or Ar
110 8 1168.910 8552.64 Nb or Ar
148 4 1169.607 8547.54 Nb or Ar
265 147 6 1169.8694 8545.623 −0.003 Nb i 15,439.25 3/2 23,984.87 1/2 1
331 5 1170.717 8539.44 Nb
82 5 1171.417 8534.34 Nb or Ar
113 3 1172.505 8526.41 Nb or Ar
244 4 1172.689 8525.08 Nb or Ar
122 99 8 1185.5216 8432.797 −0.037 Nb i 37,578.72 3/2 46,011.48 5/2 1
99 5 1187.774 8416.80 Nb or Ar
160 −34 11 1194.0077 8372.863 0.037 Nb i 20,060.84 7/2 28,433.74 9/2 1
222 89 10 1194.9204 8366.468 0.002 Nb i 13,145.71 9/2 21,512.18 7/2 1
171 5 1197.603 8347.73 Nb or Ar
123 3 1200.211 8329.59 Nb or Ar
243 3 1200.565 8327.13 Nb or Ar
187 −3 8 1261.7787 7923.152 −0.002 Nb i 19,931.98 5/2 27,855.13 7/2 1
200 111 6 1272.6302 7855.593 0.007 b Nb i 12,982.38 7/2 20,837.98 5/2 1
98 4 1288.325 7759.89 Nb or Ar
76 4 1289.542 7752.57 Nb or Ar
163 3 1290.256 7748.28 Nb or Ar
74 4 1290.631 7746.03 Nb or Ar
85 3 1290.663 7745.84 Nb or Ar
92 4 1299.156 7695.20 Nb or Ar
75 3 1299.407 7693.71 Nb or Ar
207 4 1299.687 7692.06 Nb or Ar
83 4 1299.884 7690.89 Nb or Ar
198 4 1300.160 7689.26 Nb or Ar
180 6 1300.236 7688.81 Nb or Ar
85 4 1300.288 7688.50 Nb or Ar
140 6 1300.314 7688.35 Nb or Ar
135 4 1308.181 7642.11 Nb or Ar
133 5 1339.824 7461.63 Nb or Ar
142 5 1341.798 7450.65 Nb or Ar
128 3 1342.679 7445.76 Nb or Ar
264 5 1342.883 7444.63 Nb
78 4 1344.956 7433.16 Nb or Ar
73 3 1345.924 7427.81 Nb or Ar
98 7 1345.999 7427.40 Nb or Ar
90 5 1346.082 7426.93 Nb or Ar
90 4 1348.233 7415.09 Nb or Ar
90 6 1349.381 7408.78 Nb or Ar
97 5 1351.638 7396.41 Nb or Ar
152 5 1352.808 7390.01 Nb
158 3 1355.170 7377.13 Nb or Ar
97 4 1356.345 7370.74 Nb or Ar
84 4 1377.566 7257.20 Nb or Ar
148 5 1380.984 7239.23 Nb or Ar
125 7 1382.079 7233.50 Nb or Ar
101 9 1385.856 7213.79 Nb or Ar
93 9 1386.909 7208.31 Nb or Ar
89 10 1392.016 7181.86 Nb or Ar
110 7 1396.556 7158.51 Nb or Ar
153 3 1397.328 7154.56 Nb or Ar
89 10 1397.393 7154.23 Nb or Ar
506 470 8 1398.0435 7150.898 0.082 Nb i 23,010.58 9/2 30,161.56 7/2 1
102 9 1403.046 7125.40 Nb or Ar
142 4 1408.100 7099.83 Nb or Ar
77 4 1408.404 7098.30 Nb or Ar
110 10 1408.980 7095.40 Nb or Ar ⋯ ⋯
952 781 5 1414.3063 7068.671 0.069 Nb i 23,048.58 11/2 30,117.32 9/2 2
150 4 1414.816 7066.12 Nb or Ar
223 3 1415.079 7064.81 Nb or Ar
147 9 1415.934 7060.55 Nb or Ar
215 127 11 1417.9508 7050.503 0.047 Nb i 22,936.9 7/2 29,987.45 5/2 1
203 −164 4 1419.3413 7043.596 −0.066 Nb i 11,524.65 13/2 18,568.18 11/2 1
105 7 1421.674 7032.04 Nb or Ar
76 3 1422.743 7026.76 Nb or Ar
117 4 1428.292 6999.45 Nb or Ar
95 2 1436.264 6960.60 Nb or Ar
649 7 1444.212 6922.30 Nb
77 3 1446.363 6912.00 Nb or Ar
140 4 1451.342 6888.29 Nb or Ar
96 4 1455.197 6870.04 Nb or Ar
98 4 1456.705 6862.93 Nb or Ar
94 5 1459.166 6851.36 Nb or Ar
64 3 1460.924 6843.11 Nb or Ar
100 3 1461.839 6838.83 Nb or Ar
111 3 1467.096 6814.33 Nb or Ar
79 3 1467.426 6812.79 Nb or Ar
130 2 1475.481 6775.60 Nb or Ar
84 3 1476.020 6773.12 Nb or Ar
157 3 1477.675 6765.54 Nb or Ar
662 −366 3 1480.1050 6754.431 0.039 b Nb i 13,629.15 1/2 20,383.62 3/2 1
76 3 1491.915 6700.96 Nb or Ar
82 −34 8 1494.4973 6689.385 −0.005 Nb i 11,247.88 11/2 17,937.26 9/2 1
93 5 1496.735 6679.39 Nb or Ar
113 4 1499.132 6668.70 Nb or Ar
413 −222 7 1508.6554 6626.608 0.072 Nb i 14,211.3 3/2 20,837.98 5/2 2
273 23 12 1511.7767 6612.926 −0.006 Nb i 14,899.26 5/2 21,512.18 7/2 1
218 4 1512.411 6610.15 Nb or Ar
162 4 1539.002 6495.94 Nb or Ar
102 9 1552.651 6438.84 Nb or Ar
313 177 3 1571.5895 6361.246 −0.006 b Nb i 11,044.08 9/2 17,405.32 7/2 2
489 −128 8 1604.7442 6229.821 0.009 Nb i 15,282.35 7/2 21,512.18 7/2 1

Note. W: line pattern widths in mK (1 mK = 0.001 cm−1); ${\rm{\Delta }}{W}_{{\rm{hfs}}}:$ the total separation of the strong hyperfine components in mK (1 mK = 0.001 cm−1); S/N: signal-to-noise ratio from the FT spectrum; int: intensity from [1]; ${\lambda }_{{\rm{air}}}:$ center of gravity wavelength in air from the FT spectrum; ${\sigma }_{{\rm{vac}}}:$ center of gravity transition wavenumber in vacuum from the FT spectrum; ${\rm{\Delta }}\sigma =| {E}_{{\rm{e}}}-{E}_{{\rm{o}}}| -{\sigma }_{{\rm{vac}}}:$ difference between the wavenumber in vacuum and the energy difference of the levels; a: for this line an Ar classification was found, but it is not visible in the spectrum of La–Ar plasma (2); b: blend with other line (Ar or Nb); nc: new classification for lines, already listed in (1); ${E}_{{\rm{e}}},$ ${J}_{{\rm{e}}}:$ energy level and total electronic angular momentum of the level of even parity; ${E}_{{\rm{o}}},$ ${J}_{{\rm{o}}}:$ energy level and total electronic angular momentum of the level of odd parity; npt: number of possible transitions lying in the wavenumber interval of the overall line profile width.

References. (1) Humphreys & Meggers (1945) (2) Güzelçimen et al. (2013).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3 4

From the more than 800 lines in the FT spectrum, 90 have been unambiguously classified as transitions of atomic Nb levels. In all cases, the lower level is the level of even parity. From these 90 lines, 27 are new lines, which means that they have not been published before. An additional 8 of the 90 classified Nb i lines were listed by Humphreys & Meggers (1945), but without classification. In all 8 cases, the recently published levels from Kröger et al. (2007) are involved. For the remaining 55 of 90 lines, the classifications given by Humphreys & Meggers (1945) could be confirmed.

Due to their structure, another 20 lines could be unambiguously associated with the element Nb, even though no classification could be found. This means that the unknown Nb levels are involved in these transitions. Most likely, these lines are atomic lines, not ionic, because no line could be assigned to an Nb ii transition in our IR spectrum, and also because only very weak lines of very strong ionic transitions were detected in our previous investigations of the Nb spectrum in the visible spectral range, which was recorded at very similar discharge conditions (see Kröger et al. 2010).

If we exclude all of the lines that are unambiguously identified as Ar lines, then 94 narrow lines with only one symmetrical peak remain for which no classification was found (neither Ar nor Nb) and which do not appear in the comparative FT spectrum of La–Ar plasma from Güzelçimen et al. (2013). These lines may be either Ar lines or Nb lines with narrow splitting, and are presented in Table 1. In addition, for seven narrow lines, an Ar classification is suggested, but these lines are not visible in the comparative FT spectrum of La–Ar plasma, even though all of the classified Ar lines appear to have better S/N in the La–Ar plasma. These 7 lines are also listed as "Ar or Nb" lines in Table 1 but are marked by respective comments.

In Table 1, the wavelengths in air ${\lambda }_{{\rm{air}}}$ and the vacuum wavenumbers ${\sigma }_{{\rm{vac}}}$ are listed. The wavelengths in air are calculated from the measured wavenumbers in vacuum using the dispersion relation (Peck & Reader 1972). Additionally, the line pattern widths, W, the S/N values, and the assignments are given. If a line has been published previously, then the intensity from the literature (Humphreys & Meggers 1945) is listed in the fourth column. All of the lines without a mentioned intensity from the literature are new lines. If only the classification is new, then the lines are denoted as "nc" (new classification). If a line overlaps within its line pattern width with another line, it is denoted as "b" (blended).

If a line is classified, then the upper and lower levels are listed. Moreover, the total separation ${\rm{\Delta }}{W}_{{\rm{hfs}}}$ between the hyperfine components with ${\rm{\Delta }}J={\rm{\Delta }}F,$ which is calculated by the classification program from hyperfine constants and J quantum numbers, is given in the second column. If the highest hyperfine component lies at smaller frequencies, then ${\rm{\Delta }}{W}_{{\rm{hfs}}}$ is defined as negative.

If for a particular transition the classification program offers several possible predicted line identifications, then we chose—as mentioned above—the one for which the fingerprint of the hyperfine structure matches. Nevertheless, other predictions could appear as well, but with lower intensity, which means that they could be blended by the stronger line. In an astrophysical spectrum, the temperatures and conditions differ considerably from a hollow cathode plasma. Therefore, situations may arise in which the weaker line contributes more strongly to the spectral pattern. Accordingly, the number of possible transitions ("npt") that lie within an interval of ±0.1 cm−1 around the classified line is given in the last column of Table 1.

In the seventh column of Table 1, the difference ${\rm{\Delta }}\sigma $ between the experimental wavenumber ${\sigma }_{{\rm{vac}}}$ and the calculated energy difference of levels is given for all of the classified lines:

where ${E}_{{\rm{e}}}$ and ${E}_{{\rm{o}}}$ are the energy levels of even and odd parity, respectively. When looking at these data, the relatively large values of ${\rm{\Delta }}\sigma $ can be noticed. As written in Section 2, a conservative estimate of the absolute accuracy of the center of gravity is about 0.007 cm−1. If we assume an uncertainty of about 0.01 cm−1 for most of the level energies, then the values of ${\rm{\Delta }}\sigma $ should mostly range below 0.03 cm−1 and, in particular, should be statistically distributed. However, the former requirement is true only for half of the lines and the mean value of ${\rm{\Delta }}\sigma $ is not zero, as it should be for a statistical distribution, but reaches a value of more than 0.02 cm−1. A misalignment of the wavenumber axis cannot be the reason for this discrepancy because the calibration was verified using classified Ar as described in Section 2. Therefore, the disagreement can only be caused by the level energies of Nb. Indeed, if the lines are sorted by upper or lower levels, respectively, for some levels a systematic deviation is found. Two extreme examples are given by the two levels 9497.52 cm−1, $J=7/2$ and 23,022.56 cm−1, $J=7/2.$ For the former, five lines are classified in the spectrum and the mean value of the difference ${\rm{\Delta }}\sigma $ for these five lines is 0.061 cm−1. For the latter, four lines are classified in the spectrum and the mean value of the difference ${\rm{\Delta }}\sigma $ for these four lines is 0.075 cm−1. For many other levels, the mean value of the difference ${\rm{\Delta }}\sigma $ is smaller but still significant. This fact highlights the need for a revison of the level energies of Nb. The effective deviation of the level energy will be lower than the value of ${\rm{\Delta }}\sigma $ shown in the two examples because ${\rm{\Delta }}\sigma $ is caused by deviations from upper and lower levels. An easy correction is not possible because the complete system of levels of atomic Nb should be processed commonly. A revision of the fine structure level data is envisaged by taking into account spectral data from IR, VIS, and UV. However, for the list of wavelength and wavenumbers, respectively, which is the focus of the present work, the inaccuracy of the level energies does not matter because the center of gravity of the lines is determined experimentally and is not influenced by deviations of the level energies.

5. CONCLUSIONS

The IR spectrum of Nb–Ar plasma was investigated. The aim of this work is to provide a list of Nb lines in the IR for astrophysical use. The Nb spectrum in the range from 1092 nm to 1660 nm (6022 cm−1 to 9155 cm−1) is reported for the first time.

By using the hyperfine structure as a fingerprint we were able to classify 90 atomic Nb i lines. We fitted the hyperfine patterns with the line profiles in order to determine the center of gravity positions with better than 0.01 cm−1 accuracy. With this accuracy we have detected a discrepancy which is, most probably, caused by the uncertainty of the Nb level energies. These discrepancies do not reduce the quality of the presented spectral data, which are the main focus of this paper, but instead point out the need for revision of the Nb fine structure energies.

Additionally, more than 800 Ar lines could be identified, most of them with classification. The list of Ar lines (not presented here) shows good agreement with the list published in Güzelçimen et al. (2013) for La–Ar plasma.

This work has been supported by the Istanbul University Scientific Research Projects with project No. BYP-24524 and IRP-38320. The Riga team acknowledges support from the Latvian Science Council grant No. 119/2012. The authors are indebted to Florian Gahbauer for useful comments.

Footnotes

  • The name originally given to this element and still in use at this time in USA was columbium (Cb). Only in 1950 was the name niobium (Nb) internationally officially committed.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/0067-0049/221/1/14