A recent look at the UK University Admissions web page, www.ucas.ac.uk, showed there to be no fewer than 754 physics courses offered at 57 universities. The numbers give an exaggerated estimate of the profusion of courses as most universities offer both three year and four year degrees, which count as separate courses. Even so, this means that, on average, each university is offering physics in about seven flavours from Physics with Administration to Physics and the Universe!
It is not difficult to find the reason for the amazing range of courses. Universities are increasingly short of funding and need to fill every available place. This is at a time when the number of students studying physics at post-16 level is falling and the number applying to go on to study physics at university level has fallen from 3139 in 1994 to only 2655 in 2000. Physics is seen by many teenagers as a difficult and complex course of study at university level. This, coupled with the fact that scientists are poorly paid, leads many students to consider non-physics courses.
One of the growth areas in physics courses has been the addition of Astronomy (47 courses), Astrophysics (30 courses) and, more recently, Space Science (44 courses). These are areas where students already have an ignited interest though the publicity associated with the Hubble Space Telescope and other space missions. When the Physics with Astrophysics course at Birmingham was started in 1980, only about six other UK universities offered any courses in astronomy or astrophysics. Now, nearly every university offers such a course in an attempt to attract increased numbers of students.
What happens when physics departments fail to attract enough students?
A shortage of students is one of the main reasons why many physics departments are running with a financial deficit. In addition, physics courses with significant laboratory work are expensive to operate, both in terms of manpower and equipment. Often the government's unit of resource is inadequate. In the past, universities often subsidized such departments but, in the present financial climate, they are increasingly expecting departments to `balance their books'.
One solution would be to abolish laboratory work altogether. This would reduce the number of academic staff needed to teach the course and there would be no need for funding for laboratory equipment or technical support. This has already happened in some branches of engineering where Health and Safety has decreed that high voltages and large motors are too dangerous to be operated by undergraduates. In this case, the `experimental' work is done by simulation on a PC.
A less drastic solution is the design study. In this, students work in a group and use material provided and that available on the World Wide Web to produce a detailed design, for example, a space mission. This is all well and good and may provide the opportunity to use their physics knowledge to learn the management skills of planning, group working and presentation, but the reality is that design studies never fail, whereas real experiments all too often do so. I do hope that UK funding of universities does not lead down the road of Physics with no Laboratory.
Universities in the UK are certainly short of funding, but there may be some room for optimism. The government has signalled the possibility of `top-up fees', which enables higher fees to be charged for certain courses. The Science Research Investment Fund (SRIF) has allowed universities to improve facilities to allow them to compete on a world scale. In science in particular, students are attracted to universities by their research programmes, but I hope that the teaching ideas for astronomy and space science included in this issue of European Journal of Physics will be used by other universities around the world to attract able students into the exciting world of science.