The article contains two errors. The first, which results in the loss of a solution, occurs in the statement that the t and r coordinaties can be redefined so that one obtains equation (4.13). This cannot be done in the case of a static solution without introducing t-dependence into the metric functions. For a static spacetime we can go only as far as redefining the t and r coordinates so that the ICKV is given by ξa - (t, r, 0, 0). As a result of this correction we obtain an additional static ICKV solution with metric
where c1, c2, n are arbitrary constants with 2n2>1. This solution is a transformed version of a special case of solution V of Tolman (1939). If c1c2 = 0, the fluid satisfies an equation of state of the form p/µ = constant but, in this case, the ICKV becomes a HV. When n2=1 the solution is conformally flat and is, in fact, the special case of the Schwarzschild interior solution given by equation (A51).
The second error occurs in equation (4.22), which should read
Contrary to the statement following equation (4.22), this spacetime admits only one proper ICKV, namely ; the second claimed ICKV is just the sum of ξa and the timelike KV and so is not independent.
Tolman R C 1939 Phys. Rev. 55 364