In the past couple of decades, there have been considerable advances
in the efficiency, robustness and efficacy of inversion methods in
almost every field. This is apparent in the many journal articles
published on this subject, the ever-growing number of specialized
sessions organized in major conferences, and in the several books and
proceedings that have appeared in the past few years. Inverse scattering
continues to be a primary area of research to a large number of
scientists and practitioners.
Many developments have been driven by several new applications and
some old ones, such as mathematical physics, atmospheric sciences,
geophysical prospecting, quantum mechanics, remote sensing,
underwater acoustics, nondestructive testing and evaluation, medical
imaging, to mention only a few. These developments have been applied
to a variety of data that include direct current (DC), monochromatic,
multi-frequency and transients.
The majority of the effort has gone into improving on the robustness
and speed of the various inversion techniques. A considerable effort
has also gone into addressing the nonuniqueness and ill-conditioning
that are inherent in almost all inverse scattering problems which
arise mainly as a consequence of the inadequacy and redundancy in
measurements. Many researchers have attempted to quantify these
uncertainties by resorting to probabilistic methods.
This special section is dedicated to the imaging and inversion of the Earth's
subsurface by electromagnetic means with special emphasis, though
nonexclusive, toward oil and mineral exploration, evaluation and
monitoring. The section includes 14 invited papers that cover a wide
range of topics related to this theme. This involves 30 authors from
21 academic, governmental and industrial research groups worldwide.
The subjects covered in this section encompass theoretical and
computational developments as well as experimental results. In
addition to the original and specialized contributions presented in
these papers, many authors have included an informative review of the
most recent advances in the particular subject covered in their
articles.
The papers in this special section are listed not in any particular order
but, nevertheless, we attempted to group them according to the broad
similar subjects they cover. Next, we give highlights of the various
contributions.
de Hoop sheds some insight on three closely related topics: the first
deals with how to accurately model transient electromagnetic fields
in strongly heterogeneous and dispersive media by means of
domain-integrated field equations; the second topic deals with how to
preserve causality in both the direct and the parameter estimation
problems; and the third is on the nonlinear inversion problem cast in
terms of the contrast-source wavefield formulation.
Maurer, Boerner and Curtis start with the premise that the potential
usefulness of the presently developed multidimensional
electromagnetic inversion methods in geophysics is hindered by the
deficiencies of critical information in the data. They review a
number of linear and nonlinear design strategies for geophysical
surveys that attempt to provide maximum information content within a
given budget.
Dorn, Miller and Rappaport present a two-step shape reconstruction
method for cross-well EM imaging. The first step recovers equivalent
sources from which an initial permittivity distribution is inferred.
The second step combines the 'level set technique' for representing
shapes of the reconstructed objects and an 'adjoint field technique'
for solving the nonlinear inverse problem.
Yagle develops a discrete layer stripping algorithm for the solution
of a two-dimensional inverse conductivity problem. The fully
nonlinear solution involves the transformation of the elliptic
problem into an hyperbolic one similar to a one-dimensional
Schrödinger equation but with a time-varying potential.
Bloemenkamp and van den Berg reconstruct two-dimensional dielectric
objects buried in a dielectric half space from transient electric
fields. The approach is based on the 'contrast source inversion
method', originally developed for time-harmonic waves, after
reformulating it directly in the time domain.
Saillard, Vincent and Micolau address the problem of reconstructing
the boundary and inverting the permittivity of a bounded homogeneous
cylindrical object surrounded by a randomly distributed set of
point-like scatterers in a cross-well tomography setup.
Hjelt and Pirttijärvi have further studied the thin conducting plate
model which has proven to be versatile in describing various relevant
geological features in crystalline bedrocks. Using measurements in both
the frequency and time domains they show how to assess by simple
methods the interpretability of the various model parameters that
define the plate.
Bourgeois, Suignard and Perrusson focus on mineral exploration where
a highly conductive bounded orebody embedded in a
much less conductive host Earth is to be appraised. They study a number of simple
inverse models for the rapid and robust interpretation of diffusive
electromagnetic response resulting from the interaction of the
orebody with a primary source and observed along nearby boreholes.
Haber, Ascher and Oldenburg consider nonlinear optimization
techniques where the forward problems are computed by using the
discretized differential forms of Maxwell's equations. By employing
such a sparse matrix formulation, the authors demonstrate how to
carry out the full Newton iteration with only a modest additional
cost as compared to the quasi-Newton method.
Zhang and Liu aim at the reconstruction of an axisymmetric
conductivity distribution using single-well electromagnetic induction
measurements by means of a two-step linear inversion scheme. The
approach is based on a fast Fourier and Hankel transform which is
preconditioned by the extended Born approximation.
Zhdanov and Hursan use the quasi-analytical approximation to
significantly speed-up the three-dimensional inversion of
low-frequency electromagnetic data in connection with geophysical
exploration and prospecting. The authors show a number of examples,
using multi-frequency, surface-to-surface configurations.
Alumbaugh applies linearized and nonlinear inversion techniques in a
carefully set Bayesian framework to both synthetic and
oil-field real data in two-dimensional cross-well scenarios. Using a
Monte Carlo estimation technique and quadratic programming, the
author is able to obtain estimates of parameter uncertainty and
cross-correlations in the reconstructed images, which allows him to
compare the performances of linearized and nonlinearized techniques.
Malinverno and Torres-Verdín introduce a Bayesian inference approach
to map the boundary (saturation front) of the region swept by water
around a water injection well in an oil reservoir. The solution
methodology is applied to direct current data synthesized by an array
of electrodes. The authors investigate the link between uncertainties
in the location of the front and lack of background information such
as thicknesses and resistivities of the
reservoir layers as well as the presence of noise in the data.
Newman and Hoversten examine several strategies for solving two- and
three-dimensional geophysical inverse problems which they illustrate
using a number of experimental data acquired in cross-well
configurations in connection with environmental and enhanced oil
recovery applications. The analysis is pursued within a partial
differential equation framework of the electromagnetic fields.
We hope that the exceptional list of original contributions included
in this special section will give the interested reader a fairly
good sample of the type of approaches and techniques that are
successfully applied to the electromagnetic prospecting of the Earth's
subsurface.
Our sincere thanks go to the Honorary Editors, Professors F Natterer
and F A Grünbaum for giving us the unique opportunity to act as
Guest Editors to this special section of Inverse Problems. The strong
commitment and patience of the authors at each stage of the process
are very much appreciated. Finally, an expression of gratitude goes
to Ms Elaine Longden-Chapman the Publisher of Inverse
Problems for her meticulous help in coordinating the many efforts
that went into preparing this special section.