Braunstein and Caves (Braunstein S L and Caves C M 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett.72 3439-43) proposed to use Helstrom's quantum information number to define, meaningfully, a metric
on the set of all possible states of a given quantum system.
They showed that the quantum information is nothing other than
the maximal Fisher information in a measurement of the quantum
system, maximized over all possible measurements. Combining
this fact with classical statistical results, they argued that
the quantum information determines the asymptotically optimal
rate at which neighbouring states on some smooth curve can be
distinguished, based on arbitrary measurements on n identical
copies of the given quantum system.
We show that the measurement which maximizes the Fisher
information typically depends on the true, unknown, state of
the quantum system. We close the resulting loophole in the
argument by showing that one can still achieve the same,
optimal, rate of distinguishability, by a two-stage adaptive
measurement procedure.
When we consider states lying not on a smooth curve, but on a
manifold of higher dimension, the situation becomes much more
complex. We show that the notion of `distinguishability of
close-by states' depends strongly on the measurement resources
one allows oneself, and on a further specification of the task
at hand. The quantum information matrix no longer seems to play
a central role.