The precision of measurements on a photographic plate depends on the
image area. But the dimensions of the images given by a grating
spectrograph, a Fabry-Perot spectrograph and the SIMAC are very
different. So it was interesting to develop a new comparison which
takes into account not only classical illumination but also image
size.
Then, we shall first discuss, at a given résolution the
optical arrangement which gives the greatest image area. Secondly,
we shall evaluate the signal upon noise ratio dependence with the
area and the optical density of the recording.
- Greatest image obtention
Grating spectrograph: The best illumination is
obtained when, along the direction of dispersion, the
image width is equal to the graininess « g» of the photographic emulsion. Its heigth is not
definite, but, because of the curvature of the image,
experimentalist use small part of the entrance slit. We
have choosen following limitative criteria: the angular
heigth must be such as the sagitta is equal to the limit
of resolution. (This definition gives values in good
agreement with practical ones.)
Classical Fabry-Perot spectrograph: The width of
rings must be equal to the « g »
value: this condition determines the focal length of the
objective located after the Fabry-Perot. Focal length of
the grating spectrograph which assumes the separation of
orders must be sufficient to assume the R/Nresolution. (N coefficient of « finesse
»). In fact we demonstrated that it was better to
increase this length so that «etendue» (or
acceptance) of the Fabry-Perot and the of the grating
are adapted to each other. If optical magnification of
the grating spectrograph is fixed to unity, slit must be
enhanced. With this process, illumination and resolution
are inchanged, but the useful part of the ring is more
important.
SIMAC: Because of the most important «
ètendue » delivered by the Fabry-Perot
interferometer, it is possible to adapt a short focus
grating spectrograph. But then, the total Fabry-Perot
has to be illuminated to get the hightest possible
image.
Under these conditions, calculatins shows that, at agiven résolutin, these three
spectrographs deliver quite the same energy by unit
time.
Signal to noise RatioClark Jone's and Felgett's works
etablish the existence of a meximum of the detective quantum
efficiency for the photographic receiver. For a given emulsion,
there is an optimal density D0. So, we can
separate the discussion into two parts.
In the first case, we assume that we can reach in
a reasonable time the optical densityD0 with the slowest instrument.
Under these conditions, if we use the Selwyn's law
(density fluctuations are inversely proportionnal to the
square root surface) and the reciprocity law, we see
that the signal to noise ratio is varying as the square
root time, exactly as in spectrometry.
So, in this case, the three instrument are quite
equivalent. The gain in rapidity is strictly compensated
by a loss in signal to noise ratio. If we increase the
image area of the Fabry-Perot spectrograph or of the
SIMAC, we shall have the same exposure time and signal
to noise ratio as with the grating spectrograph. Note,
in this purpose that in the case of the SIMAC the change
of focus length is not necessary because of the
semi-sequential recording.
In the second case (D0 is not
accessible in a reasonable exposure time), the study of
the variation of signal to noise ratio against density
demonstrates that it is better to choose a short focus
instrument. The decrease of the signal to noise ratio is
compensated by the gain of detective quantum efficiency
especially for very weak illuminations.