Optical designers have always had reason to be interested in the question: how well can the practical performance of optical systems be predicted from calculations based on geometrical optics? A large number of experimental investigations have indicated that the scalar wave theory (Huyghens-Kirchhoff diffraction theory) can predict the intensity distribution in the image of a point object well enough for the purposes of instrumental optics. Thus a natural approach to the above question is to consider how well ray-theoretic evaluations of image quality agree with those based on the scalar wave theory. In those favourable cases where the agreement is good, that is to say where the effects of diffraction can be disregarded without introducing unacceptably large evaluation errors, geometrical optics can be expected to provide an adequate basis for practical optical design. The problem of delimiting the favourable cases then arises.
Some results bearing on this problem are obtained in the present paper. In §2 it is shown how, by the use of distribution functions, the contrast transmission properties of ray-theoretic images can be discussed in a way which overcomes the well-known difficulty connected with infinite ray-densities. A sharpened form of a result of Hopkins and Miyamoto is obtained (equation (2.18)) and used to discuss the sense in which the wave-theoretic image of an extended object by a small-field monochromat with given geometrical aberrations approaches the ray-theoretic image as the wavelength λ->0.
In §3 the relations between wave-theoretic and ray-theoretic quality evaluations of photographic images are considered. The importance of the relation between photographic spread and optical spread to the above question is clarified, and it is shown that if emulsion spread is held fixed while the aberrations are multiplied by a constant factor A, wave-theoretic and corresponding ray-theoretic photographic quality evaluations need not approach equality as A->infinity; they will do so, however, if the emulsion spread is also multiplied by A.
In §4, computed quality evaluations are examined for model photographic systems with 1, 2, 4 and 8 wavelengths of fourth-power aberration, working at focal ratios 2, 4, 8, 16 over a range of focal settings in each case. Three wave-theoretic evaluations (3.9) are considered, together with the corresponding ray approximations (3.12). It appears that, over this range of special cases, the ray theoretic evaluation (3.13) can safely be used at focal ratios F less-than-or-eq, slant 4 and the error of the ray approximation (3.12) depends much more strongly on the focal ratio F than on the amount of fourth-power aberration.