This paper is a qualitative discussion of some features of the electronic structure of metals that are almost independent of the arrangement of the atoms. In any densely packed assembly, solid or liquid, the atomic volume fixes the overlap between neighbouring atomic potentials, and hence determines the approximate position of the muffin-tin zero,
MTZ, the energy at which a classical electron would be free to move from cell to cell. The general electronic structure of the metal depends upon
MTZ and upon the way in which each atomic potential is modified into a muffintin potential.
For example, recent theory has confirmed the argument of Wigner and Seitz that the bottom of the nearly free-electron bands of the pseudopotential formulation must lie a little below
MTZ. This is, therefore, the main parameter determining the distance from the Fermi level to the core states, which cannot be calculated accurately by the pseudopotential method. The transition from tight-bound to nearly free bands as the atoms are brought together, and the position of d bands, conceived as resonances of the muffin-tin potentials, also depend critically on
MTZ.
Electron correlation and exchange make the construction of a self-consistent muffin-tin potential much more difficult. The Friedel sum rule is not necessarily valid for the muffin-tin wells, and the screened pseudopotential formula cannot be justified rigorously. In the spirit of the `neutral pseudo-atom' concept, where each ion is assigned a share of the conduction electron density, various elementary screening models are investigated, but it turns out that pseudopotential `core shifts', etc., are quite sensitive to the choice of approximation. Recent results on the electron density in metals and semiconductors suggest that the starting point for self-consistency calculation might even be to superpose the fields and charge clouds of neutral Hartree atoms.