We have discovered a phase problem in the version of the R-matrix codes
that was used to calculate the final state Ψ- with the proper
boundary conditions. While there is no effect on total cross sections,
the triple-differential cross section graphs presented in our paper need to be corrected. The general tendency is a
reduction of the binary peak and an increase of the recoil peak.
The corrected results for the `3 + 2' and `1-HF' models are shown in figure 1,
in comparison with the first-order and second-order results of Byron et al (1986)
and with the experimental data of Müller-Fiedler et al (1985).
Note that our revised results are in significantly better agreement
with those of Byron et al (1986) and also with those from other calculations
(see, for example, Bray and Fursa 1996) than the earlier predictions,
particularly due to the increase in the recoil peak. Finally, we point out
that the general conclusions given in our paper, regarding the effects
of various approximations on the theoretical results, remain valid.

Figure 1. Triple-differential cross section for electron impact ionization of He(1s2)
at incident energy/ejected energy/scattering angle combinations of
256 eV, 3 eV, 4° (top) and 256 eV, 3 eV, 10° (bottom)
as a function of the ejection angle.
(3 + 2)-state R-matrix (second order) ————;
(3 + 2)-state R-matrix (first order) – – – –;
1-HF R-matrix (second order) - - - - - -;
1-HF R-matrix (first order) - - - - - -;
second-Born results of Byron et al (1986) - · - · - · -;
first-Born results of Byron et al (1986) ········;
experiment of Müller-Fiedler et al (1985)
.
These results replace those given in figures 1 and 2 of Reid et al (1998).