Yaakov Rosenfeld
This special issue on density functional theory is dedicated to
the memory of Yaakov (Yasha) Rosenfeld. The Liquid State
community lost an exceptional scientist and a special friend on
21 July 2002. Yasha had intended to contribute to this volume.
Sadly, he died from lung cancer at the age of 54.
Yasha made outstanding contributions to the statistical mechanics
of liquids and dense plasmas. He was the author of more than
100 papers, several of which are regarded as `classics'. His
early work was on the theory of freezing in simple fluids and on
high pressure equations of state. In 1979, together with N W Ashcroft,
he developed the idea of universality of the bridge
function for simple fluids. The key publication [1] proved very
influential in the theory of bulk liquids and carries >400
citations. At about the same time Yasha began his lifelong
studies of the properties of classical plasmas, focussing on the
equation of state in the strong-coupling limit. He remains a
major figure in the theory of Coulomb fluids to which he
successfully applied the ideas of Onsager `charge smearing',
providing a lower bound to the electrostatic energy. In the
mid-80s Yasha turned his attention to the properties of fluids
in the asymptotic high density limit (AHDL), arguing that at
sufficiently high densities hard-core liquids and the classical
one-component plasma (OCP) share common structural and
thermodynamic features and that it is possible to perform a
perturbative analysis about the AHDL, i.e. about packing fraction
η = 1 for hard spheres and plasma parameter Γ = ∞ for the OCP. Whilst some of the concepts introduced in the AHDL papers appeared
esoteric to many researchers, these provided a basis for much of
Yasha's later work. An example of his skilful combination of
classical and quantum DFT for dense ion-electron plasmas is
contained in [2]. This paper provided inspiration for later
Thomas-Fermi molecular dynamics simulations developed in France
and the USA (Livermore).
In a remarkable paper [3] he developed a new graphical expansion
for the pair direct correlation functions cij(2)
of uniform mixturesof hard particles. The expansion involves pair overlap volumes as basis functions and pair excluded volumes as basic variables.
Yasha showed that the lowest order version of the theory, the
`scaled field particle approximation' yields cij(2)
that are the same
as those of Percus Yevick (PY) theory for hard spheres in D (odd)
dimensions. The paper, which constitutes a synthesis of scaled
particle ideas and PY theory, provided geometric approximations
for cij(2) based
on expansions in terms of the fundamental measures
of hard particles. It was an important forerunner for Yasha's
first contribution [4] to hard-sphere DFT, a Letter which
continues to have an enormous influence on the development and
on the applications of classical DFT.
We recall some of the history. Independently, Tarazona [5] and
Curtin and Ashcroft [6] had constructed weighted-density
approaches to DFT, primarily for the hard-sphere fluid. Their
strategy was to write the excess free energy functional asFex[ρ]=∫ dr ρ(r) Ψex((r)) where
the excess free energy per particle Ψex is evaluated at some
coarse-grained or weighted density (r).
The weight function w(r;),
which determines (r), was obtained by requiring the second
functional derivative of -β Fex[ρ]
to yield an accurate c(2) for the
uniform fluid and in practice this meant enforcing the known PY
result for hard spheres. Although the approaches proved very
successful in a wide variety of applications (including
hard-sphere freezing) they are somewhat ad hoc in character and
extensions to mixtures are not straightforward. Yasha [4]
started from a very different perspective, motivated by his
earlier work [3]. His is foremost a theory for hard-sphere
mixtures, and it is based upon a deconvolution of the Mayer f
functions fij(r) in terms of four scalar and two vector weight
functions. The functional is written as
βFex[{ρi}]= ∫ dr Φ({nα(r)}) where Φ is a function of the weighted densities
{nα(r)} with α
labelling the six weights. In the uniform fluid the weighted
densities reduce to the usual scaled particle variables. Φ is
constructed so that Fex recovers the exact low densitiy limit and
satisfies a certain thermodynamic requirement (a brief summary
can be found in [7]). The resulting functional generatescij(2) which are identical to those of PY theory. Since Yasha's
approach is based on the geometrical properties of the spheres he
termed it fundamental measure theory (FMT). Unlike the earlier
approaches, where the density dependent weight has a range equal
to the hard sphere diameter, in FMT the range of the weights is
equal to the radius. FMT has now become the theory of choice for
most DFT practitioners and the number of applications to
inhomogeneous, and, indeed, bulk systems is growing very
rapidly-as can be gleaned from several papers in the present volume.
In subsequent papers Yasha proposed extensions of his FMT to
nonspherical, hard convex bodies.
Another important development of FMT was made in [8]. As
the title suggests, this paper encompasses many topics in the
theory of liquids; one of us had the (pleasurable!) task of
refereeing it-the original version was longer and broader in
its scope than the published version of 23 pages in J. Chem.
Phys. A key feature is a self-consistent approach for
determining the density profiles for general fluid mixtures in
external potentials. Crudely speaking, Fex[{ρ}]is expanded about a
uniform reference fluid and terms beyond second order are
approximated by a `bridge functional', assumed to be universal.
Self-consistency is imposed by the test-particle procedure for
the uniform fluid where the method is equivalent to the modified
HNC theory. The approach enabled the ideas of FMT to be taken
over to a very wide class of liquids, including Coulomb fluids,
and has proved very successful for determining the one-body
structure of highly inhomogeneous fluids, and bulk fluid pair
structure.
The theory of freezing was a favourite topic of Yasha. The
original FMT [4] could not account for the freezing transition
of the hard sphere fluid. For some time this lead Yasha to
ponder whether freezing could/should be described by DFT. (He
was not too impressed by results from the earlier DFTs!)
However, during a sabbatical year spent in Bristol, Düsseldorf,
Lyon, Madrid, München, ... he enquired how the FMT could be
modified in order to incorporate freezing. He and his
co-workers argued that an accurate DFT should account for
dimensional crossover, i.e. situations for which the fluid is
confined to effectively lower dimensionality such as in narrow
slits or cylindrical pores. In particular they focused on the
zero-dimensional limit, which pertains to a cavity that can
contain at most one sphere mimicking the situation of a sphere
restricted to a site of the crystal lattice, and constructed
empirical modifications to the original result for the reduced
free energy function Φ({nα(r)}] that could recover the exact free energy in this limit [9].
The resulting functionals provided a good description of the
freezing transition for the hard sphere fluid and found
applications in other situations of extreme confinement. In
subsequent work with Tarazona [10], Yasha developed a systematic
FMT approach based entirely on knowledge of the exact free
energy in the zero dimensional limit. Such an approach has
provided an excellent account of the properties of the
hard-sphere solid and, as discussed by M. Schmidt in this
volume, has provided a powerful prescription for generating DFTs
for other types of fluids. Moreover it enabled Yasha to make
contact with and shed new light on his earlier work on the AHDL
for fluids and solids. Among other recent extensions of FMT,
Yasha and co-workers made one of the first attempts to include
the solvent explicitly in DFT of electric double-layers [11].
Yasha continued working until the end. Bravely he attended the
Les Houches Meeting for JPH in April 2002 and his
contribution appeared in the special issue [12]. Another paper
[13] appeared on July 22, one day after his death.
Of course our brief description does not do justice to Yasha's
contributions to physics nor does it reflect properly his
inimitable style. Reading his papers (not an easy challenge but
one that is ultimately rewarding!) one could not fail to be
impressed by Yasha's remarkable insight, ingenuity and technical
mastery of the subject. He thought about problems in a unique,
sometimes near mystical, way. He made connections where other
researchers could not. He was inspirational in discussion-even
if one was not really sure where his ideas originated. He
enlivened the subject. It was a privilege to work with Yasha and
to know him personally. Each of us has his own recollections of
times with Yasha. RE remembers walking in the countryside
outside of Bristol, discussing details of the AHDL. We got lost
and ended up in the grounds of a mental hospital. Fortunately we
obtained a ride from a doctor and his patient. RE persuaded
Yasha, or was it the other way round, that it was better not to
restart the discussion. HL experienced Yasha's ingenuity and
`good nose' in fields removed from physics. Yasha persuaded him
to buy a particular stock (TEVA) in March 2000 when the high
tech stocks were booming (a detailed list of all Yasha's
recommendations is available on request). The TEVA stock
continues to flourish contrary to the general Nasdaq crash. In
February 2000 JPH experienced Yael and Yasha's boundless
hospitality when they proudly showed him around many parts of
Israel, including the Dead Sea, Masada and Jerusalem. Rapidly
science gave way to spirited discussions on archaeology, history
and the state of world affairs!
We shall miss a gentleman of science.
R Evans, J-P Hansen and H Löwen
References
[1] Rosenfeld Y and Ashcroft N W 1979 Theory of simple classical
fluids-universality in the short-range structure
Phys. Rev.
A
20
1208
[2] Ofer D, Nardi E and Rosenfeld Y 1988 Interionic correlations in plasmas- Thomas-Fermi hypernetted-chain density-functional theory
Phys. Rev.
A
38
5801
[3] Rosenfeld Y 1988 Scaled field particle theory of the structure and the thermodynamics of isotropic hard particle fluids
J. Chem. Phys.
89
4272
[4] Rosenfeld Y 1989 Free energy model for the inhomogeneous
hard-sphere fluid mixture and DFT of freezing
Phys. Rev. Lett.
63
980
[5] Tarazona P 1984
Mol. Phys.
52
81
Tarazona P and Evans R 1984
Mol. Phys.
52
847
Tarazona P 1985
Phys. Rev.
A
31
2672
[6] Curtin W A and Ashcroft N W 1985
Phys. Rev.
A
32
2909
[7] Roth R, Evans R, Lang A and Kahl G 2002
J. Phys.:Condens. Matter
14
12063
[8] Rosenfeld Y 1993 Free energy model for inhomogeneous fluid mixtures:
Yukawa-charged hard spheres, general interactions, and plasmas
J. Chem. Phys.
98
8126
[9] Rosenfeld Y, Schmidt M, Löwen H and Tarazona P 1996
Fundamental measure free energy density functional for hard spheres:
dimensional crossover and freezing
Phys. Rev.
E
55
4245
[10] Tarazona P and Rosenfeld Y 1997 From zero-dimensional cavities to free-energy functionals for hard disks and hard spheres
Phys. Rev.
E
55
R4873
[11] Biben T, Hansen J-P and Rosenfeld Y 1998 Generic density functional for electric double layers in a molecular solvent
Phys. Rev.
E
57
R 3727
[12] Rosenfeld Y 2002 Structure and effective interactions in multi-component hard-sphere liquids: fundamental-measure density functional approach
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter
14
9141
[13] Juranek H, Redmer R and Rosenfeld Y 2002 Fluid variational theory for pressure dissociation in dense hydrogen: multicomponent reference system and non-additivity effects
J. Chem. Phys.
117
1768