Abstract
The ageing of various glass forming materials (polycarbonate, polystyrene, polyvinyl acetate and triphenylethene) has been studied by differential scanning calorimetry. The variation of the relaxation enthalpy ΔH with the ageing time measured in a large domain of time is compared to the variation of volume ΔV reported in the literature. Simple and complex thermal treatments (memory effect) can be distinguished.
In simple thermal treatments (annealing at a unique temperature) the following can be concluded.
(a) The glass at equilibrium is a liquid: the relaxation time τf to reach equilibrium, the saturation of enthalpy, is the time predicted by the Vogel–Fulcher–Tamman (VFT) law and the heat capacity is equal to that of the liquid.
(b) The kinetic laws giving the enthalpy, ΔH = kH log t, and the volume, ΔV = kV log t, are observed between the initial τi (H) and τi*(V) and final times τf (H) and τf* (V). For PS and PVAc we show that the times obtained by these two techniques are comparable, τi = τi* and τf = τf*. The initial relaxation times (or incubation times) follow the Arrhenius law and the final times (or equilibrium times) verify the VFT law. It is shown that for polymers the experimental slopes kH and kV can be deduced from this VFT (WLF) law, kH = C2 ΔCp /C1 and kV = C2 Δα/C1, C1 and C2 being the coefficients of the WLF equation and ΔCp and Δα being the jumps of the heat capacity and of the expansion coefficient at Tg.
In complex thermal treatments (annealing at two different temperatures) the enthalpy relaxation is compared to the volume relaxation (the memory effects) studied by Kovacs and Struik. In any case the kinetics presents two regimes, which defines an equivalent time teq; this is the annealing time necessary to erase the previous thermal history of the glass; the origin of this time is discussed. Above teq the kinetics is not different from that of simple treatments; below teq no variation of ΔH is observed.
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS