The following papers represent about one-half (twelve out of
twenty-five) of the presentations at the Surphon 11 Workshop held
at Meramec, Missouri in October 2003. Papers of the preceding
(2001) workshop were published as a special issue of Journal
of Physics: Condensed Matter (2002 volume 14, issue 24). The
announced scope of these workshops, Surface Dynamics,
Phonons, Adsorbate Vibrations, and Diffusion, is so broad that
one may question whether there is an underlying unity to the
meetings. The answer is yes, and the discussions and comments on
the contributions, while not reported here, met the goal of
fostering constructive interactions. In the following, I attempt
to illustrate this.
One general feature of the work is common to research in most of
modern condensed matter physics and surface science in particular.
The systems under
discussion are tailored materials or otherwise controlled at the
(sub)nanometer length scale. There is an immense variety for the
choice of substrate, face exposed by the substrate, and the
adsorbate. Some effort is in effect a service, helping to
characterize a system for others who will build applications on it
or incorporate it in a more complex composite. Other effort aims
to improve understanding at the atomic and molecular scale,
especially when the phenomena are `simple enough' that there is a
good prospect for a quantitative account using first principles
theory. Characteristically, a wide range of experimental and
theoretical techniques are synthesized to meet these goals. For
instance, the papers in this volume include experiments with
helium atom scattering (HAS, QHAS) [1], low-energy
electron diffraction (LEED) [2,3],
scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) [3], x-ray
diffraction [4], and high-resolution electron energy
loss spectroscopy (HREELS) [5]. In closely related
experiments, thermal desorption (TDS) [6],
ellipsometry, [7] and neutron scattering
[8] are applied. The balance has evolved over the
series of workshops and in the near future one may anticipate a
larger component of inelastic and quasi-elastic neutron scattering
(INS, QENS) as new facilities are completed.
There is a continuing attempt to use atomic scattering in
qualitatively new ways. The last proceedings had a
review [9] of efforts to greatly improve the energy
resolution of helium beams using spin-echo methods for 3He. The
present one has a review [10] of developments of field
ionization detectors for He beams that have the prospect of
improved detection efficiency and higher spatial resolution for
atom interferometers. Since the detection efficiency for most
thermal helium beam instruments is only 1/105, there appears to
be much room for improvement, but progress has been slow. Another
continuing effort is the implementation and interpretation of
surface scattering with metastable He beams to probe substrate
electronic structures, but the experimental work has had its full
share of controversy [11-13].
The focus of these workshops has been on dynamics, but the setting
is defined by the spatial structures and surprisingly complex
growth scenarios occur for thin films, especially for molecular
films. These have been clarified with multi-technique
experiments [4]. Even for the adsorption of inert gases,
it has been a long process to determine the adsorption sites of
minimum energy [2, 14]. In this
sub-field, first principles theory now is at the stage of
quantitative comparison with
experiments [15, 16].
Two examples using ideas of quantum chemistry were presented at
the workshop but were published
elsewhere [17, 18].
There is work with new materials and more highly controlled
materials [19]. In one example, the structure of a
quasicrystal was determined by LEED and scanning tunnelling
microscopy and the substrate was then used as an adsorbing
surface [3]. Even in the Henry's law regime, there are
surprises, and a quantitative analysis demonstrates how open the
effective surface is. Another example is the use of vicinal
surfaces to introduce a controlled population of step defects and
then to characterize the excitations of molecules adsorbed at the
steps [5].
About half of the papers are primarily theoretical. Further, the
standard for LEED experiments in this area is to include
quantitative analysis of intensities [2] and
experiments on adsorption in the Henry's law regime usually
include model building of the adsorption potential
energy [3]. For inelastic atomic scattering the
situation is decidedly less routine. The contributions here
include a review [20] of the development of a mixed
quantum-classical theory of inelastic molecular scattering by
surfaces and an extension [21] of analytical results
for quasi-elastic helium atom scattering with application to low
energy and diffusive motions.
One of the theory papers [22] relates to
dissipative processes in friction. At first sight this involves a
rather different time scale than those for the dynamics emphasized
here. However, with increased energy resolution, the surface
dynamics experiments get to time scales of several picoseconds
while some experiments on sliding friction get down to time scales
of a few nanoseconds [23]. Thus, there remains a
considerable gap to bridge before the two areas overlap in a
useful fashion. Still, this is one likely direction for progress
and illustrates both the changing cast of characters in the field
and the extensive base of knowledge that is needed for
quantitative analysis of both the adsorbate damping and sliding
friction. The Surphon workshops appear to have a long life ahead.
L W Bruch
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA (e-mail: lwbruch@wisc.edu)
Acknowledgment
This work has been partially supported by NSF-DMR0104300.
References
[1] Wöll Ch 2004 J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter16 S2981
[2] Diehl R D, Seyller Th, Caragiu M, Leatherman G S,
Ferralis N, Pussi K, Kaukasoina P and Lindroos M 2004 J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter16 S2839
[3] Trasca R A, Ferralis N, Diehl R D and Cole M W 2004 J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter16 S2911
[4] Mo H, Trogish S, Taub H, Ehrlich S N,
Volkmann U G, Hansen F Y and Pino M 2004 J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter16 S2905
[5] Vattuone L, Savio L and Rocca M 2004 J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter16 S2929
[6] Widdra W, Trischberger P, Friess W, Menzel D, Payne S H
and Kreuzer H J 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 4111
[7] Young H S, Meng X F and Hess G B 1993 Phys. Rev. B 4814556
[8] Bienfait M, Asmussen B, Johnson M and
Zeppenfeld P 2000 Surf. Sci.460 243
[9] Jardine A P, Ellis J and Allison W 2002 J. Phys.: Condens.
Matter14 6173
[10] Doak R B 2004 J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter16 S2863
[11] Witte G 2004 J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter16 S2937
[12] Trioni M I, Butti G and Bonini N 2004 J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter16 S2923
[13] El-Batanouny M 2002 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter14 6281
[14]
Gottlieb J M 1990 Phys. Rev. B 42 5377
Müller J E 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett.65 3021
[15] Betancourt A E and Bird D M 2000 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter12 7077
[16] Da Silva J L F, Stampfl C and Scheffler M 2003Phys. Rev. Lett.90 066104
[17] Bagus P S, Staemmler V and Wöll C 2002Phys. Rev. Lett.89 096104
[18] Phillips J M, Leibsle F, Holder A J and Keith T 2003 Surf. Sci.545 1
[19] Danisman M F, Casilis L, Nickel B and
Scoles G 2004 to be published
[20] Moroz I, Ambaye H and Manson J R 2004 J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter16 S2953
[21] Vega J L, Guantes R and Miret-Artes S 2004 J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter16 S2879
[22] Vanossi A, Santoro G and Bortolani V 2004 J. Phys.:
Condens. Matter16 S2895
[23] Dayo A, Alnasrallah W and Krim J 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett.80 1690
Persson B N J 1998 Sliding Friction - Physical Principles and Applications (Berlin: Springer)