This review puts in doubt the classical description of the Verwey (metal–insulator)
transition in magnetite on the basis of the wide set of experiments carried out over the last
60 years. We re-analyse here the most relevant experiments used to study the Verwey
transition from the point of view of their degree of agreement with the proposed
Fe2+–Fe3+
charge ordering model. We will consider three groups of experimental studies, according to
their capability of detecting different ionic species and/or a charge periodicity:
(1) Experiments which have been interpreted using the charge ordering model as the
starting point though they are not able to demonstrate its validity. This is the case for
macroscopic properties such as the electrical resistivity, the heat capacity and the magnetic
properties. (2) Experiments which can distinguish different types of Fe ions, such
as Mössbauer, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and electronic spectroscopies.
However, we show that they are not able to associate them with a specific valence
(2+
or 3+
in our case) and, in some cases, they observe more than two different kinds of iron
atoms. (3) Diffraction (x-ray, neutron and electron) experiments, which are the
most conclusive ones for determining a periodic ordering of different entities.
These experiments, instead, point to the lack of ionic charge ordering. We will
focus, in particular, on the discussion of the results of some recent x-ray resonant
scattering experiments carried out on magnetite that directly prove the lack of ionic
charge ordering in such mixed valence oxide. Furthermore, we also reconsider some
so-called Verwey-type transition metal oxides in terms of the applicability of the
Verwey charge ordering model. We show that a complete charge disproportionation
(δ)
is not experimentally observed in any of these compounds, the maximum
δ being
less than 0.5 e−. Regarding the theoretical framework, we will outline some relevant implications for the
description of the physics of 3d transition metal oxides of this critical re-examination of the
experimental facts on magnetite. Electronic localization should then occur involving more
than one transition metal atom, so the definition of ionic d states loses its meaning in mixed
valence transition metal oxides.