Recently there has been considerable interest in the displacive ferroelectric phase transition near
T = 28 K in
O-18 isotopic strontium titanate. Special efforts have been made to combine the quantum criticality
exponents α = −2
(2D) or −3
(3D), δ = 3, and γ = 2
with the thermodynamic inequalities of Rushbrooke, Griffiths, Widom et al, which become exact
equalities under the hypothesis of scaling. In particular, these have led others to the inference that
γ = 2.0
and β = 1.2
in SrTiO3.
First we show that this is mathematically incorrect and explain why (quantum criticality is exact only
at T = 0, whereas the thermodynamic (in)equalities are valid everywhere except
T = 0). Second, we show that the inferred values strongly violate a new equality,
γ−2β = ν(4−d−2η)>0, we derive from hyperscaling. Third, we show that the existing soft mode frequency data
ω(T)
from Takesada et al (2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. at press) yield above
Tc
(from the Lyddane–Sachs–Teller relationship)
γ = 1.0. Fourth, we
remeasure β from
the polarization P(T)
and find β = 0.50 ± 0.02. Fifth, we remeasure the electric susceptibility and find that it
perfectly satisfies the Salje–Wruck–Thomas equation, which requires
γ = 1.0. The important
conclusions are: (a) O-18 SrTiO3
near Tc
is mean-field; (b) the thermodynamic scaling equalities of Rushbrooke, Griffiths et al are mathematically
incompatible with quantum criticality theory; (c) a new hyperscaling relationship makes
β = 1.2
and β>γ/2
impossible.