1. Introduction
Despite unprecedented government funding and public interest in
nanotechnology, few can accurately define the scope, range or potential
applications of this technology. One of the most pressing issues facing
nanoscientists and technologists today is that of communicating with the
non-scientific community. As a result of decades of speculation, a number of
myths have grown up around the field, making it difficult for the general
public, or indeed the business and financial communities, to understand what
is a fundamental shift in the way we look at our interactions with the
natural world. This article attempts to address some of these misconceptions,
and explain why scientists, businesses and governments are spending large
amounts of time and money on nanoscale research and development.
2. What is nanotechnology?
Take a random selection of scientists, engineers, investors and the general
public and ask them what nanotechnology is and you will receive a range of
replies as broad as nanotechnology itself. For many scientists, it is
nothing startlingly new; after all we have been working at the nanoscale for
decades, through electron microscopy, scanning probe microscopies or
simply growing and analysing thin films. For most other groups, however,
nanotechnology means something far more ambitious, miniature submarines in
the bloodstream, little cogs and gears made out of atoms, space elevators
made of nanotubes, and the colonization of space. It is no wonder people
often muddle up nanotechnology with science fiction.
3. What is the nanoscale?
Although a metre is defined by the International Standards Organization as
`the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval
of 1/299 792 458 of a second' and a nanometre is by definition 10- 9
of a metre, this does not help scientists to communicate the nanoscale to
non-scientists. It is in human nature to relate sizes by reference to
everyday objects, and the commonest definition of nanotechnology is in
relation to the width of a human hair.
Unfortunately, human hairs are highly variable, ranging from tens to
hundreds of microns in diameter (10-6 of a metre), depending on the colour, type and the part of the body from which they are taken, so what is needed is a standard to which we can relate the nanoscale. Rather than asking anyone to imagine a millionth or a billionth of something, which few sane people can accomplish with ease, relating nanotechnology to atoms often makes the nanometre easier to imagine. While few non-scientists have a clear idea of how large an atom is, defining a nanometre as the size of 10 hydrogen, or 5 silicon atoms in a line is within the power of the human mind to grasp. The exact size of the atoms is less important than communicating the fact that nanotechnology is dealing with the smallest parts of matter that we can manipulate.
4. Science fiction
While there is a commonly held belief that nanotechnology is a futuristic
science with applications 25 years in the future and beyond, nanotechnology
is anything but science fiction. In the last 15 years over a dozen Nobel
prizes have been awarded in nanotechnology, from the development of the
scanning probe microscope (SPM), to the discovery of fullerenes. According to CMP Científica, over 600 companies are currently active in nanotechnology,
from small venture capital backed start-ups to some of the world's largest
corporations such as IBM and Samsung. Governments and corporations worldwide
have ploughed over $4 billion into nanotechnology in the last year alone.
Almost every university in the world has a nanotechnology department, or
will have at least applied for the funding for one.
Even more significantly, there are companies applying nanotechnology to a
variety of products we can already buy, such as automobile parts, clothing and ski wax. Nanotechnology is already all around us if you know where to look.
The confusion arises in part because many people in the business world do
not know where to look. Over the last decade, technology has become
synonymous with computers, software and communications, whether the internet
or mobile telephones. Many of the initial applications of nanotechnology are
materials related, such as additives for plastics, nanocarbon particles for
improved steels, coatings and improved catalysts for the petrochemical
industry. All of these are technology based industries, maybe not new ones,
but industries with multi-billion dollar markets.
5. The nanotechnology industry
It is increasingly common to hear people referring to `the nanotechnology
industry', just like the software or mobile phone industries, but will such
a thing ever exist? Many of the companies working with nanotechnology are
simply applying our knowledge of the nanoscale to existing industries,
whether it is improved drug delivery mechanisms for the pharmaceutical
industry, or producing nanoclay particles for the plastics industry. In fact
nanotechnology is an enabling technology rather than an industry in its own
right. No one would ever describe Microsoft or Oracle as being part of the
electricity industry, even though without electricity the software industry
could not exist. Rather, nanotechnology is a fundamental understanding of
how nature works at the atomic scale. New industries will be generated as a
result of this understanding, just as the understanding of how electrons can
be moved in a conductor by applying a potential difference led to electric
lighting, the telephone, computing, the internet and many other industries,
all of which would not have been possible without it.
While it is possible to buy a packet of nanotechnology, a gram of nanotubes
for example, it would have zero intrinsic value. The real value of the
nanotubes would be in their application, whether within existing industry,
or to enable the creation of a whole new one.
6. Fantastic voyage
Shrinking machines down to the size where they can be inserted into the human
body in order to detect and repair diseased cells is a popular idea of the
benefits of nanotechnology, and one that even comes close to reality. Many
companies are already in clinical trials for drug delivery mechanisms based
on nanotechnology, but unfortunately none of them involve miniature submarines.
It turns out that there are a whole range of more efficient ways that
nanotechnology can enable better drug delivery without resorting to the use
of nanomachines.
Just the concept of navigating ones way around the body at will does not
bear serious scrutiny. Imagine attempting to go against the flow in an
artery—it would be like swimming upstream in a fast flowing river, while
boulders the size of houses, red and white blood cells, rained down on you.
Current medical applications of nanotechnology are far more likely to
involve improved delivery methods, such as pulmonary or epidermal methods to
avoid having to pass through the stomach, encapsulation for both delivery and
delayed release, and eventually the integration of detection with delivery,
in order for drugs to be delivered exactly where they are needed, thus
minimizing side effects on healthy tissue and cells. As far as navigation
goes, delivery will be by exactly the same method that the human body uses,
going with the flow and `dropping anchor' when the drug encounters its
target.
7. Shrinking stuff
Another common misconception is that nanotechnology is primarily concerned
with making things smaller. This has been exacerbated by images of tiny
bulls, and miniature guitars that can be strummed with the tip of an AFM,
that while newsworthy, merely demonstrate our new found control of matter
at the sub-micron scale. While almost the whole focus of micro-technologies
has been on taking macro-scale devices such as transistors and mechanical
systems and making them smaller, nanotechnology is more concerned with our
ability to create from the bottom up. In electronics, there is a growing
realization that with the end of the CMOS roadmap in sight at around 10 nm,
combined with the uncertainly principal's limit of Von Neuman electronics at
2 nm, that merely making things smaller will not help us. Replacing CMOS
transistors on a one for one basis with some type of nano device would have
the effect of drastically increasing fabrication costs, while offering only
a marginal improvement over current technologies.
However, nanotechnology offers us a way out of this technological and
financial cul-de-sac by building devices from the bottom up. Techniques such
as self assembly, perhaps assisted by templates created by nano imprint
lithography, a notable European success, combined with our understanding of
the workings of polymers and molecules such as Rotoxane at the nanoscale
open up a whole new host of possibilities. Whether it is avoiding Moore's
second law by switching to plastic electronics, or using molecular
electronics, our understanding of the behaviour of materials on the scale of
small molecules allows a variety of alternative approaches, to produce
smarter, cheaper devices. The new understandings will also allow us to design new architectures, with the end result that functionality will become a more
valid measure of performance than transistor density or operations per
second.
8. Nanotechnology is new
It often comes as a surprise to learn that the Romans and Chinese were using
nanoparticles thousands of years ago. Similarly, every time you light a
match, fullerenes are produced. Degusssa have been producing carbon black,
the substance that makes car tyres black and improves the wear resistance of
the rubber, since the 1920s. Of course they were not aware that they were
using nanotechnology, and as they had no control over particle size, or even
any knowledge of the nanoscale they were not using nanotechnology as
currently defined.
What is new about nanotechnology is our ability to not only see, and
manipulate matter on the nanoscale, but our understanding of atomic scale
interactions.
9. Building atom by atom
One of the defining moments in nanotechnology came in 1989 when Don Eigler
used a SPM to spell out the letters IBM in xenon atoms. For the first time
we could put atoms exactly where we wanted them, even if keeping them there
at much above absolute zero proved to be a problem. While useful in aiding
our understanding of the nanoworld, arranging atoms together one by one is
unlikely to be of much use in industrial processes. Given that a Pentium 4
processor contains 42 million transistors, even simplifying the transistors
to a cube of 100 atoms on each side would require 42 x 102 operations, and that is before we start to consider the other material and devices needed in a functioning processor.
Of course we already have the ability to build things atom by atom, and on a
very large scale; it is called physical chemistry, and has been in
industrial use for over a century producing everything from nitrates to
salt. To do this, we do not need any kind of tabletop assembler as in Star
Trek, usually a few barrels of readily available precursor chemicals and
maybe a catalyst are all that is required.
Compare this with the difficulty of producing anything organic atom by atom,
a sausage for example. Everyone is familiar with the macroscale ingredients
of a sausage, some meat, maybe some fat, cartilage or other kinds of tissue,
even some bone, all encased in animal gut. Never mind, argue the proponents
of assemblers, things are simpler at smaller scales.
Zooming down to the microscale we still have far more complexity than we
would like to attempt to replicate, with cells, cytoplasm, mitochondria,
chromosomes, ribosomes and many other highly complex items of natural
engineering. Moving closer to the nanoscale, we still have to deal with
nucleic acids, nucleotides, peptides and proteins, none of which we fully
understand, or expect to even have the computing power to understand in the
near future.
In terms of return on our investment, a farmyard containing a few pigs is a
far more effective sausage machine than we could ever design, and has
several other by-products such as hams and a highly effective waste disposal
system. This serves to illustrate just how far we are away from being able
to replicate nature.
10. Attack of the killer nanobots
In terms of capturing the public imagination, unleashing hordes of
self-replicating devices that escape from the lab and attack anything in their
path is always going to be popular. Unfortunately nature has already beaten
us to it, by several hundred million years. Naturally occurring
nanomachines, that can not only replicate and mutate as they do so in order
to avoid our best attempts at eradication, but can also escape their hosts and
travel with alarming ease through the atmosphere. No wonder that viruses are
the most successful living organisms on the planet, with most of their
`machinery' being well into the nano realm. However, there are finite limits
to the spread of such `nanobots', usually determined by their ability, or
lack thereof, of converting a sufficiently wide range of material needed for
future expansion. Indeed, the immune systems of many species, while unable
to completely neutralize viruses without side effects such as runny noses,
are so effective in dealing with this type of threat as a result of the wide
range of different technologies available to a large complex organism when
confronted with a single purpose nano-sized one. For any threat from the
nano world to become a danger, it would have to include far more
intelligence and flexibility than we could possibly design into it.
Our understanding of genomics and proteomics is primitive compared with that
of nature, and is likely to remain that way for the foreseeable future. For
anyone determined to worry about nanoscale threats to humanity should consider mutations in viruses such as HIV that would allow transmission via mosquitoes, or deadlier versions of the influenza virus, which deserve far more concern than
anything nanotechnology may produce.
11. Conclusions
Nanotechnology, like any other branch of science, is primarily concerned
with understanding how nature works. We have discussed how our efforts to
produce devices and manipulate matter are still at a very primitive stage
compared to nature. Nature has the ability to design highly energy efficient
systems that operate precisely and without waste, fix only that which needs
fixing, do only that which needs doing, and no more. We do not, although one
day our understanding of nanoscale phenomena may allow us to replicate at
least part of what nature accomplishes with ease.
While many branches of what now falls under the umbrella term nanotechnology
are not new, it is the combination of existing technologies with our new
found ability to observe and manipulate at the atomic scale that makes
nanotechnology so compelling from scientific, business and political
viewpoints.
For the scientist, advancing the sum total of human knowledge has long been
the driving force behind discovery, from the gentleman scientists of the
17th and 18th centuries to our current academic infrastructure.
Nanotechnology is at a very early stage in our attempts to understand the
world around us, and will provide inspiration and drive for many generations
of scientists.
For business, nanotechnology is no different from any other technology: it
will be judged on its ability to make money. This may be in the lowering of
production costs by, for example, the use of more efficient or more selective
catalysts in the chemicals industry, by developing new products such as
novel drug delivery mechanisms or stain resistant clothing, or the creation
of entirely new markets, as the understanding of polymers did for the
multi-billion euro plastics industry.
Politically, it can be argued that fear is the primary motivation. The US
has opened up a commanding lead in terms of economic growth, despite recent
setbacks, as a result if the growth and adoption of information technology.
Of equal significance is the lead in military technology as demonstrated by
the use of unmanned drones for both surveillance and assault in recent
conflicts. Nanotechnology promises far more significant economic, military
and cultural changes than those created by the internet, and with
technology advancing so fast, and development and adoption cycles
becoming shorter, playing catch-up will not be an option for governments who
are not already taking action.
Maybe the greatest short term benefit of nanotechnology is in bringing
together the disparate sciences, physical and biological, who due to the
nature of education often have had no contact since high school. Rather than
nanosubmarines or killer nanobots, the greatest legacy of nanotechnology may
well prove to be the unification of scientific disciplines and the resultant
ability of scientists, when faced with a problem, to call on the resources
of the whole of science, not just of one discipline.
Tim Harper

About the author
Tim Harper is the Founder and President of CMP Cientifica, and the co-author of the Nanotechnology Opportunity ReportTM, described by NASA as `the defining report in the field of nanotechnology'. Tim is also the Founder and
Executive Director of European NanoBusiness Association and an advisor to the US NanoBusiness Alliance. He contributes a weekly column to the Institute of Physics Nanotechweb site and writes a regular column for Tornado Insider magazine. Tim also publishes, and occasionally edits, the weekly nanotechnology newsletter TNT Weekly which has been running since 2000 and is widely read across the entire nanotechnology community, from academics to investors.
In October 2002 Time magazine described Tim as `the face of European nanotechnology' and profiled him in their Digital Europe Top 25, as one of Europe's top 25 entrepreneurs. This was followed in November by
recognition in Small Times magazine who described Tim as `Europe's pre-eminent nanotech spokesman outside of government'.
Tim founded CMP Cientifica in 1997, which organizes Europe's largest scientific nanotechnology conference, TNT 200x. The company also manages both the Phantoms network, which coordinates European nanoelectronics
research, and the NanoSpain network which links the Spanish scientific nanotechnology community.
Before founding CMP Cientifica, Tim was an engineer at the European Space Agency's research and development centre in Noordwijk, the Netherlands. He managed the micro- and nano-scale characterization facility, and has published
extensively on analytical techniques and characterization of advanced materials.
Originally from the UK, Tim currently lives in Madrid, Spain, with his family. He has previously worked in the UK, the US, Germany, and the Netherlands.