Paper

On extracting design principles from biology: II. Case study—the effect of knee direction on bipedal robot running efficiency

and

Published 2 February 2015 © 2015 IOP Publishing Ltd
, , Citation M Haberland and S Kim 2015 Bioinspir. Biomim. 10 016011 DOI 10.1088/1748-3190/10/1/016011

1748-3190/10/1/016011

Abstract

Comparing the leg of an ostrich to that of a human suggests an important question to legged robot designers: should a robot's leg joint bend in the direction of running ('forwards') or opposite ('backwards')? Biological studies cannot answer this question for engineers due to significant differences between the biological and engineering domains. Instead, we investigated the inherent effect of joint bending direction on bipedal robot running efficiency by comparing energetically optimal gaits of a wide variety of robot designs sampled at random from a design space. We found that the great majority of robot designs have several locally optimal gaits with the knee bending backwards that are more efficient than the most efficient gait with the knee bending forwards. The most efficient backwards gaits do not exhibit lower touchdown losses than the most efficient forward gaits; rather, the improved efficiency of backwards gaits stems from lower torque and reduced motion at the hip. The reduced hip use of backwards gaits is enabled by the ability of the backwards knee, acting alone, to (1) propel the robot upwards and forwards simultaneously and (2) lift and protract the foot simultaneously. In the absence of other information, designers interested in building efficient bipedal robots with two-segment legs driven by electric motors should design the knee to bend backwards rather than forwards. Compared to common practices for choosing robot knee direction, application of this principle would have a strong tendency to improve robot efficiency and save design resources.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Access this article

The computer you are using is not registered by an institution with a subscription to this article. Please choose one of the options below.

Login

IOPscience login

Find out more about journal subscriptions at your site.

Purchase from

Article Galaxy
CCC RightFind

Purchase this article from our trusted document delivery partners.

Make a recommendation

To gain access to this content, please complete the Recommendation Form and we will follow up with your librarian or Institution on your behalf.

For corporate researchers we can also follow up directly with your R&D manager, or the information management contact at your company. Institutional subscribers have access to the current volume, plus a 10-year back file (where available).

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/1748-3190/10/1/016011