Erratum • The following article is Free article

Erratum: "Synthesis of Binary Magnesium–Transition Metal Oxides via Inverse Coprecipitation"

, , , , and

Published 20 February 2015 • © 2015 The Japan Society of Applied Physics
, , Citation Shunsuke Yagi et al 2015 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 54 039206 DOI 10.7567/JJAP.54.039206

Download Article PDF

This is a correction for 2013 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 52 025501

Article metrics

778 Total downloads

Share this article

Author e-mails

s-yagi@21c.osakafu-u.ac.jp

Author affiliations

1 Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Research Center, Osaka Prefecture University, Sakai 599-8570, Japan

2 Office of Society-Academia Collaboration for Innovation, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8520, Japan

3 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan

Dates

  1. Received 3 February 2015
  2. Accepted 4 February 2015
  3. Published

Buy this article in print

Journal RSS
Sign up for new issue notifications
1347-4065/54/3/039206

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Previous article in issue

In Table II, the fractional coordinates of Mg and Mn ions in MgMn2O4 are wrong. The corrected coordinates and related fitting parameters for MgMn2O4 are as below.

Oxides (Space group) Atom Site Occupancy x y z B (Å2) U (Å2)
(b) MgMn2O4 (I41/amd) Vol. A-141-1 Sintered at 500 °C Mg1 4b 1 0 0 1/2 0.45(6) 0.0057(7)
Mn1 4b 0 0 0 1/2 0.45 0.0057
Mg2 8c 0 0 1/4 1/8 0.59(2) 0.0075(2)
Mn2 8c 1 0 1/4 1/8 0.59 0.0075
O 16h 1 0 0.2735(3) 0.3664(2) 0.8 (fixed) 0.0101

This error arose from the mixture of the fractional coordinates of the origin choices 1 and 2. For the actual structure refinement by the Rietveld analysis, the origin choice 1 was adopted and the profile fitting was completely conducted without any errors. The error in Table II is a typing error, which does not change the fitting result and the outline of the discussion and the conclusion.

10.7567/JJAP.54.039206