Five years of variability in the global carbon cycle: comparing an estimate from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 and process-based models

Zichong Chen; Deborah N Huntzinger; Junjie Liu; Shilong Piao; Xuhui Wang; Stephen Sitch; Pierre Friedlingstein; Peter Anthoni; Almut Arneth; Vladislav Bastrikov; Daniel S Goll; Vanessa Haverd; Atul K Jain; Emilie Joetzjer; Etsushi Kato; Sebastian Lienert; Danica L Lombardozzi; Patrick C McGuire; Joe R Melton; Julia E M S Nabel; Julia Pongratz; Benjamin Poulter; Hanqin Tian; Andrew J Wiltshire; Sönke Zaehle; Scot M Miller

doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abfac1

Letter • The following article is Open access

Five years of variability in the global carbon cycle: comparing an estimate from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 and process-based models

Zichong Chen^24,1, Deborah N Huntzinger², Junjie Liu³, Shilong Piao⁴, Xuhui Wang⁴, Stephen Sitch⁵, Pierre Friedlingstein⁶, Peter Anthoni⁷, Almut Arneth⁷, Vladislav Bastrikov⁸, Daniel S Goll⁹, Vanessa Haverd¹⁰, Atul K Jain¹¹, Emilie Joetzjer¹², Etsushi Kato¹³, Sebastian Lienert¹⁴, Danica L Lombardozzi¹⁵, Patrick C McGuire¹⁶, Joe R Melton¹⁷, Julia E M S Nabel¹⁸, Julia Pongratz^18,19, Benjamin Poulter²⁰, Hanqin Tian²¹, Andrew J Wiltshire²², Sönke Zaehle²³ and Scot M Miller¹

Published 4 May 2021 • © 2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd
Environmental Research Letters, Volume 16, Number 5 Citation Zichong Chen et al 2021 Environ. Res. Lett. 16 054041 DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abfac1

Download Article PDF

DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

View article

Article metrics

3282 Total downloads

Submit

Submit to this Journal

Supplementary data

Five years of variability in the global carbon cycle: comparing an estimate from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 and process-based models

Article metrics

Submit

Share this article